Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Skull-Face
Unavailable
Skull-Face
Unavailable
Skull-Face
Ebook132 pages2 hours

Skull-Face

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this ebook

This early work by Robert E. Howard was originally published in the 1929 and we are now republishing it with a brand new introductory biography. 'Skull-Face' is one of Howard's stories featuring the character Sailor Steve Costigan and his hashish addiction. Robert Ervin Howard was born in Peaster, Texas in 1906. During his youth, his family moved between a variety of Texan boomtowns, and Howard – a bookish and somewhat introverted child – was steeped in the violent myths and legends of the Old South. At fifteen Howard began to read the pulp magazines of the day, and to write more seriously. The December 1922 issue of his high school newspaper featured two of his stories, 'Golden Hope Christmas' and 'West is West'. In 1924 he sold his first piece – a short caveman tale titled 'Spear and Fang' – for $16 to the not-yet-famous Weird Tales magazine. Howard's most famous character, Conan the Cimmerian, was a barbarian-turned-King during the Hyborian Age, a mythical period of some 12,000 years ago. Conan featured in seventeen Weird Tales stories between 1933 and 1936 which is why Howard is now regarded as having spawned the 'sword and sorcery' genre. The Conan stories have since been adapted many times, most famously in the series of films starring Arnold Schwarzenegger.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherWhite Press
Release dateFeb 12, 2015
ISBN9781473397804
Unavailable
Skull-Face

Read more from Robert E. Howard

Related to Skull-Face

Related ebooks

Fantasy For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Skull-Face

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

6 ratings1 review

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    One of the best stories in this collection, the title story, "Skull-Face", is also one of the worst. The best bits are the atmosphere of decay lying at the heart of imperial London; the cosmopolitan and diverse nature of the society shown; the main character's presentation as a person ravaged by the trauma of fighting in the trenches of WWI; and, as might be expected with Howard, an unrelenting forward momentum through the plot. The worst bits are, essentially, the same as the best bits: The decay of empire, which is taken without question to be a bad thing, is blamed upon the diversity in society; the response to trauma is set as a personal failing requiring redemption, rather than as an injury unjustifiably inflicted; the pace of the plot allows no time for reflection upon the issues raised, indeed the issues are not recognised as such, as the story is a conservative exercise in the need to maintain the social and political status quo, and which is therefore not questioned. Beyond the inevitable imperialist tenor of what is a variety of the "Yellow Peril" pulp fiction trope, Howard brings in more overt racist and white supremacist elements than I recall from Sax Rohmer's Fu Manchu stories (which I've not read for some time), though perhaps that transparency is a good thing: the racism is not cloaked at all.I found the worst story in the collection (and in my recent reading) to be "Black Canaan", set in the US deep South, it is a white supremacist wet dream which I couldn't finish it.The other stories in the collection fit the common apologism for pulp fiction works of this era: that they simply reflect the commonly held views of the time and place in which they were written. Accordingly, these other stories have racism as incidental or secondary features of the narrative, rather than being the central theme. It is possible for me to read around the racism in those stories to appreciate the weird horror elements that I'm actually interested in, but they are still a distraction.Re-reading this book after several decades of life experience is an interesting and instructive exercise, and one which leads me to a reevaluation of Howard as a writer, and as a promoter of conservative libertarian, and white supremacist, ideas. That I've downgraded my rating by only one star is due to a nostalgic sentimentality for the undoubted escapist pleasure Howard's stories gave me as a youth, despite their ideological underpinnings.