Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook906 pages55 hours
The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Second Edition
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
In follow-up studies, dozens of reviews, and even a book of essays evaluating his conclusions, Gerald Rosenberg’s critics—not to mention his supporters—have spent nearly two decades debating the arguments he first put forward in The Hollow Hope. With this substantially expanded second edition of his landmark work, Rosenberg himself steps back into the fray, responding to criticism and adding chapters on the same-sex marriage battle that ask anew whether courts can spur political and social reform.
Finding that the answer is still a resounding no, Rosenberg reaffirms his powerful contention that it’s nearly impossible to generate significant reforms through litigation. The reason? American courts are ineffective and relatively weak—far from the uniquely powerful sources for change they’re often portrayed as. Rosenberg supports this claim by documenting the direct and secondary effects of key court decisions—particularly Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade. He reveals, for example, that Congress, the White House, and a determined civil rights movement did far more than Brown to advance desegregation, while pro-choice activists invested too much in Roe at the expense of political mobilization. Further illuminating these cases, as well as the ongoing fight for same-sex marriage rights, Rosenberg also marshals impressive evidence to overturn the common assumption that even unsuccessful litigation can advance a cause by raising its profile.
Directly addressing its critics in a new conclusion, The Hollow Hope, Second Edition promises to reignite for a new generation the national debate it sparked seventeen years ago.
Finding that the answer is still a resounding no, Rosenberg reaffirms his powerful contention that it’s nearly impossible to generate significant reforms through litigation. The reason? American courts are ineffective and relatively weak—far from the uniquely powerful sources for change they’re often portrayed as. Rosenberg supports this claim by documenting the direct and secondary effects of key court decisions—particularly Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade. He reveals, for example, that Congress, the White House, and a determined civil rights movement did far more than Brown to advance desegregation, while pro-choice activists invested too much in Roe at the expense of political mobilization. Further illuminating these cases, as well as the ongoing fight for same-sex marriage rights, Rosenberg also marshals impressive evidence to overturn the common assumption that even unsuccessful litigation can advance a cause by raising its profile.
Directly addressing its critics in a new conclusion, The Hollow Hope, Second Edition promises to reignite for a new generation the national debate it sparked seventeen years ago.
Unavailable
Related to The Hollow Hope
Related ebooks
The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Impossibility of Religious Freedom: New Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnequal under Law: Race in the War on Drugs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCourts Liberalism And Rights: Gay Law And Politics In The United States and Canada Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Embattled Vote in America: From the Founding to the Present Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Context: Women and Rights Discourse in Nineteenth-Century America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRace and Crime: Geographies of Injustice Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Street Politics of Abortion: Speech, Violence, and America's Culture Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUsual Cruelty: The Complicity of Lawyers in the Criminal Injustice System Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America's Largest Criminal Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Until We Reckon: Violence, Mass Incarceration, and a Road to Repair Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrdinary Injustice: How America Holds Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Critical Legal Studies Movement: Another Time, A Greater Task Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Judicial Politics in Polarized Times Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRuth Bader Ginsburg’s Legacy of Dissent: Feminist Rhetoric and the Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding Mass Incarceration: A People's Guide to the Key Civil Rights Struggle of Our Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Let's Get Free: A Hip-Hop Theory of Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Judge in a Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5With Liberty and Justice for Some: How the Law Is Used to Destroy Equality and Protect the Powerful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Enigma of Clarence Thomas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Burning Down the House: The End of Juvenile Prison Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Hollow Hope
Rating: 3.8333333333333335 out of 5 stars
4/5
6 ratings2 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The title asks "Can Courts Bring About Social Change?", and Rosenberg does not pull any punches in his answer: "No". And he makes this case with reference to what is considered to be the judiciary's proudest moment: school desegregation in the wake of Brown v. Board of Education.Or should we say, the lack of desegregation. As Professor Rosenberg indicates, the most striking thing about the years following Brown is just how little impact it had. In 1954, the year Brown was decided, .001% of Black schoolchildren the south attended integrated schools (that *point* 001%, so 1 in 100,000). In 1958, that had risen to .13%, and by 1962 it was a whopping .45% -- so still, less than one-half of one percent. Desegregation didn't begin in earnest until Congress passed the Civil Rights Act and basically began dangling huge sums of money in front of local school boards as an incentive.Of course, many argue that Brown's value was symbolic or galvanizing in increasing the pressure of the civil rights movement. Obviously this sort of causal chain is harder to prove or disprove, but Rosenberg makes a game effort, examining media coverage and rhetoric in both the White and Black community to try and see just how influential Brown was (he concludes that, at least at the time of the decision, far less than commonly presumed).One does not have to follow Rosenberg all the way down his road to find his argument provocative and worth pondering. Indeed, when I assign it to my students, this is a book that always gets a rise out of everyone -- but also causes more than a few to remark that it has caused them to really rethink their beliefs and examine the law of this era with a more critical eye. That's the mark of a piece of scholarship that is justly influential, and The Hollow Hope is well-deserving of its place as one of the most important books on the American judiciary of the past 50 years.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Review of eBookIs it possible for the courts to bring about political and social reform?Efforts to use the courts to bring about significant changes in social issues such as civil rights, abortion, and women’s rights were largely futile, asserts the author, suggesting that the courts are not the real instrument of social change. Rather, conscious deliberation and choice lie at the center of moral issues and social change.Comparing the Constrained Court [weak, ineffective, powerless] and the Dynamic Court [vigorous, powerful, proponents of change], the author suggests that change from the courts is dependent upon the bounded nature of constitutional rights, the lack of independence from other branches of the government in order to bring about significant social reform, and the lack of the tools to develop appropriate policies and implement decisions regarding social reform.A study of Brown vs. the Board of Education [1954] shows that the court’s decision had virtually no effect in actually implementing its decision. In fact, it took several actions outside of the court for school segregation to become the norm. First, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, followed the next year by the Voting Rights Act and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The result of these actions was that significant progress in implementing the decisions of the Brown case took place. Following the 1954 decision, there was negligible change in desegregating schools; when, in 1965, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare tied funding to desegregating the schools, the move to desegregate was swift. The text, supplemented with graphs, tables, and charts, also includes several appendices, case references, notes, and other references. Sections include Civil Rights, Abortion, The Environment, Reapportionment, and Criminal Law, and Same-Sex Marriage.Readers may find the limited power of the court to be a bit surprising, but there is much to consider for those interested in making changes to current policy. Recommended.