The Ides of March: A Novel
By Thornton Wilder and Jeremy McCarter
3.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
“Mr. Wilder has brought to his character the warmth which was totally lacking in the Caesar of schoolbooks and Shakespeare, and in his hero’s destruction there is the true catharsis.”
—Edward Weeks, Atlantic
First published in 1948, The Ides of March is a brilliant epistolary novel of the Rome of Julius Caesar. Through imaginary letters and documents, Wilder brings to life a dramatic period of world history and one of its magnetic personalities.
In this novel, the Caesar of history becomes Caesar the human being as he appeared to his family, his legions, his Rome, and his empire in the months just before his death. In Wilder’s inventive narrative, all Rome comes crowding through his pages. Romans of the slums, of the villas, of the palaces, brawling youths and noble ladies and prostitutes, and the spies and assassins stalking Caesar in his Rome.
Thornton Wilder
Thornton Wilder (1897-1975) was an accomplished novelist and playwright whose works, exploring the connection between the commonplace and cosmic dimensions of human experience, continue to be read and produced around the world. His Bridge of San Luis Rey, one of seven novels, won the Pulitzer Prize in 1928, as did two of his four full-length dramas, Our Town (1938) and The Skin of Our Teeth (1943). Wilder's The Matchmaker was adapted as the musical Hello, Dolly!. He also enjoyed enormous success with many other forms of the written and spoken word, among them teaching, acting, the opera, and films. (His screenplay for Hitchcock's Shadow of a Doubt [1943] remains a classic psycho-thriller to this day.) Wilder's many honors include the Gold Medal for Fiction from the American Academy of Arts and Letters, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and the National Book Committee's Medal for Literature.
Read more from Thornton Wilder
Our Town: A Play in Three Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ides of March: A Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThree Plays: Our Town, The Matchmaker, and The Skin of Our Teeth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bridge of San Luis Rey: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Skin of Our Teeth: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Matchmaker Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Cabala Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Cabala and The Woman of Andros: Two Novels Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bridge of San Luis Rey: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bridge of San Luis Rey Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Selected Letters of Thornton Wilder Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNarration: Four Lectures Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Town (SparkNotes Literature Guide) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bridge of San Luis Rey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bridge of San Luis Rey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bridge of San Luis Rey (Warbler Classics Annotated Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cabala Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Ides of March
Related ebooks
The Collected Essays Volume One: Occasional Prose, The Writing on the Wall, and Ideas and the Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPatriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom’s Furies: How Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Ayn Rand Found Liberty in an Age of Darkness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Course of Human Events: The 2003 Jefferson Lecture in the Humanities Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Thrillers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Virginian (with an Introduction by Struthers Burt) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big Money Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mind of the Negro As Reflected in Letters During the Crisis 1800-1860 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Man Without Shoes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMasters of Despair Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Man Who Was Thursday (Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading): A Nightmare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrime Movers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Protocols of the Elders of Sodom: And Other Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vagabond Witness: Victor Serge and the Politics of Hope Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAll Things Considered (Annotated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnder Western Eyes Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Fallen Leaves: Last Words on Life, Love, War, and God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resurrections: Authors, Heroes—and a Spy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings7 short stories that Gemini will love Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding Don DeLillo Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntellectual Memoirs: New York, 1936–1938 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecret Historian: The Life and Times of Samuel Steward, Professor, Tattoo Artist, and Sexual Renegade Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Memories of the Great & the Good Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLives and Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Degradation of American History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiterary Rogues: A Scandalous History of Wayward Authors Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Stepping Westward: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Best Canadian Essays 2021 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJoseph Conrad Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Words of Theodore Roosevelt: Quotations from the Man in the Arena Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Literary Fiction For You
The Tattooist of Auschwitz: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flowers for Algernon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Little Birds: Erotica Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Handmaid's Tale Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Demon Copperhead: A Pulitzer Prize Winner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5East of Eden Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All the Ugly and Wonderful Things: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tender Is the Flesh Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Covenant of Water (Oprah's Book Club) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life of Pi: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Annihilation: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Piranesi Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 7 1/2 Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Catch-22: 50th Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Old Man and the Sea: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'm Thinking of Ending Things: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pride and Prejudice: Bestsellers and famous Books Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Who Have Never Known Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lost Flowers of Alice Hart Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lady Tan's Circle of Women: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Queen's Gambit Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Confederacy of Dunces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Woman in the Room: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Grandmother Asked Me to Tell You She's Sorry: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Till We Have Faces: A Myth Retold Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Leave the World Behind: A Read with Jenna Pick Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Farewell to Arms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Ides of March
10 ratings8 reviews
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5In this work of historical fiction, Wilder uses a combination of letters, diary entries and official documents to tell the story of the last year of Julius Caesar’s life. Thank heavens I already knew the basic outline of this story. It was simply torture to read. Wilder divides the novel into four “books.” But the time frames overlap. For example, book one begins with a letter dated Sep 1 (45 BC), includes later entries marked “written the previous spring, has a memo dated Sep 30 near the end, followed by two undated notes, and a final document “written some fifteen years after the preceding.” Then we move on to Book Two, which begins with a letter dated Aug 17 (45 BC). S*I*G*H The second difficulty I had was with the names / relationships. They frequently use nick names or code names when trying to ensure secrecy from prying eyes, should a letter fall into the wrong hands. THEY know who they refer to, but this reader was frequently confused. And the third reason I found this so challenging are the many asides / footnotes / remarks that the author inserts. For example, in Book I, in the middle of a rather long “historical document” the author writes: Here follows the passage in which cicero discusses the possibility that Marcus Junius Brutus may be Caesar’s son. It is given in the document which opens Book IV..Now, I appreciate Wilder’s writing, and there were times in the book that I was completely engaged in the story. I was fascinated to read of the intrigue and espionage, the role of Cleopatra, etc. But on the whole … well I think I had more “fun” translating Cicero’s oration against Cataline when I studied Latin in high school (and I hated that).
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Wilder's own effort at giving us new insight into the murder of Julius Caesar. Told using letters, we see fate unfolding remorselessly.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I found this tedious when I didn't have the wherewithal for tedious. Still, the letters were interesting, and at another time in life I would have finished it.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5It was clever of Wilder to put this novel in the form of letters and official correspondences, because this allows the action to do the talking, and for him to use the historical Caesar and Cleopatra as a framework to ponder deeper questions – man’s role in the universe, the nature of power, and destiny. This is also certainly an erudite work, showing off not only Wilder’s education and knowledge in the classics, but also his post-war interaction with Sartre and existentialism. Here’s how he described the latter in a letter to a friend, which I smiled over: “Baby, you’ll sit up. There is no God; there is the concession of the absurdity of man’s reason in a universe which can never be explained by reason; yet there is a freedom of the will defended for the first time on non-religious grounds, and how.”It’s somewhat interesting to see the side of Caesar dealing with day to day operational issues with running the state, ruing the superstitious rites of the religion of the day, and maneuvering through politics with great clemency and stoicism, but I think critics were right in pointing out that the novel is a bit on the intellectual side, one saying it was like a Roman portrait bust, “cold, precise, artful, and quite lacking in the divine fire that glows about a major work of art.” Have a look at the amazing (to me anyway) quotes though: On being too decisive without deliberation; it reminds me of a leader I know:“Caesar is not a philosophical man. His life has been one long flight from reflection. At least he is clever enough not to expose the poverty of his general ideas; he never permits the conversation to move toward philosophical principles. Men of his type so dread all deliberation that they glory in the practice of the instantaneous decision. They think they are saving themselves from irresolution; in reality they are sparing themselves the contemplation of all the consequences of their acts. Moreover, in this way they can rejoice in the illusion of never having made a mistake; for act follows so swiftly on act that it is impossible to reconstruct the past and say that an alternative decision would have been better. They can pretend that every act was forced on them under emergency and that every decision was mothered by necessity. This is the vice of military leaders for whom every defeat is a triumph and every triumph almost a defeat.”On love unrequited; this from the poet Catullus:“It is torture to be awake and not beside you; it is starvation to be asleep and not beside you. At dark I went out with Attius – another torture, to be thinking only of you and yet not to talk of you. It is midnight. I have written and written and torn up what I have written. Oh, the sweetness, the wildness of love, what tongue can tell it? Why must I attempt it; why was I born to be hunted by demons to tell of it?”On the meaning of life; I loved the last line:“You taught me all that I know; but you stopped short. You withheld the essential. You taught me that the world has no mind. When I said - that you remember and why I said it – that life was horrible, you said no, that life was neither horrible nor beautiful. That living had no character at all and had no meaning. You said that the universe did not know that men were living in it.And this one, arriving at truth by subtraction:“And none of these meanings are meanings for me, though at various times in my life I have held all of them. With the loss of each of them I have been filled with an increased strength. I feel if I can rid myself of the wrong ones, I shall be coming closer to the right one. But I am an aging man. Time presses.”And:“Life has no meaning save that which we confer upon it. It neither supports man nor humiliates him. Agony of mind and uttermost joy we cannot escape, but those states have, of themselves, nothing to say to us; those heavens and hells await the sense we give to them … With this thought I dare at last to gather about me those blessed shades of my past whom hitherto I had thought of as victims of life’s incoherence. I dare to ask that from my good Calpurnia a child may arise to say: On the Meaningless I choose to press a meaning and in the wastes of the Unknowable I choose to be known.”On poetry:“I believe that all poets in childhood have received some deep wound or mortification from life which renders them forever fearful of all the situations of our human existence. In their hatred and distrust they are driven to build in imagination another world. The world of poets is the creation not of deeper insights but of more urgent longings. Poetry is a separate language within the language contrived for describing an existence that never has been and never will be, and so seductive are their images that all men are led to share them and to seem themselves other than they are. I take it to be confirmation of this that even when poets write verses which pour scorn on life, describing it in all its evident absurdity, they do it in such a way that their readers are uplifted by it, for the terms of the poets’ condemnation presuppose a nobler and fairer order by which we are judged and to which it is possible to attain.”
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Roman a lettres not my favourite format, too bitty. Central characters are familiar enough, but then too many side characters with confusing names. some nice bits by Catullus in myth writing passages.But Wilder's way of adding authenticity, with notes, bits in Latin, section headings for left out sections, make it even more confusing. And he tells us already in the intro that he's changed the time sequence of some events - why? When it came to bits in capital letters for emphasis, I gave up. All the Latin would have been in caps, for Jupiter's sake!
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This is only loosely a historical novel --it combines events leading up to Caesar's assassination with the much earlier events surrounding Catullus's love for Clodia ("Lesbia') and the scandal when Clodia's brother Publius Clodius was caught disguised as a woman attending the rites of Bona Dea which were strictly for women only; he was allegedly there to see his presumed lover who was then Caesar's wife (the one he divorced for not being "above suspicion") -- she was not in fact his wife at the time of the events leading to his death. It is told as an epistolary novel with wonderful letters not only from the characters already mentioned but also other figures such as Cicero and letters to a hideously mutilated Roman officer whom Caesar takes care of. Rereading it lately, I thought some of Caesar's philosophical musings pretentious but much of the rest stands up --it develops real suspense even knowing how events turned out.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Well, what can I say about this? Some books are very difficult to love, or even get through. It helped that this one was short. Which sounds as if I thought this book was terrible, but it really wasn't. It was well-written, it was just not something I could really get into.I knew before starting out that it was told in a format of a series of letters and that it had some serious historical inaccuracy. The historical inaccuracy didn't so much bother me; the letter format though made it hard for me to really get into the flow of the story. Though it did lend it a certain "historical" feel in a sense.Certain things were very odd, like at one point there's a series of chain letters being distributed around Rome, which would be very difficult to do in a age without a printing press or copy machine. And there's an "Aemillian Droughts and Swimming Club" which just took me right out of the time period of the novel every time it was mentioned, because it just didn't fit.A lot of really antiquated ideas about women in here, and I can't honestly tell if it's because Thornton Wilder was writing this in the late 1940s or if he was writing what he thought Roman men thought about women (which they well might have).I didn't really buy that Caesar would be so fascinated by Catullus. I don't know, I just didn't.Overall, I kind of felt like I wasn't really smart enough to enjoy a book like this.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good fun; I remember increasingly admiring Caesar. Favourite letter: 'For answer, the messenger was carefully rehearsed in an obscene expletive'.