Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 424 Volume 17, New Series, February 14, 1852
By William Chambers and Robert Chambers
()
Read more from William Chambers
Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 438 Volume 17, New Series, May 22, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 443 Volume 17, New Series, June 26, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 418 Volume 17, New Series, January 3, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 426 Volume 17, New Series, February 28, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 430 Volume 17, New Series, March 27, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 459 Volume 18, New Series, October 16, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 437 Volume 17, New Series, May 15, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, Volume 17, Index New Series, January-June 1852. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 423 Volume 17, New Series, February 7, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 445 Volume 18, New Series, July 10, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 446 Volume 18, New Series, July 17, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 428 Volume 17, New Series, March 13, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 435 Volume 17, New Series, May 1, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 450 Volume 18, New Series, August 14, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 452 Volume 18, New Series, August 28, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 453 Volume 18, New Series, September 4, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 458 Volume 18, New Series, October 9, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 455 Volume 18, New Series, September 18, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 432 Volume 17, New Series, April 10, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 461 Volume 18, New Series, October 30, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 442 Volume 17, New Series, June 19, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 419 Volume 17, New Series, January 10, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 456 Volume 18, New Series, September 25, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 440 Volume 17, New Series, June 5, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 457 Volume 18, New Series, October 2, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 462 Volume 18, New Series, November 6, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 425 Volume 17, New Series, February 21, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 420 Volume 17, New Series, January 17, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 439 Volume 17, New Series, May 29, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 434 Volume 17, New Series, April 24, 1852 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 424 Volume 17, New Series, February 14, 1852
Related ebooks
A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 9 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlackwood's Edinburgh Magazine — Volume 56, No. 345, July, 1844 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ancien Régime Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case for Land Nationalisation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgrarian Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alien Invasion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFiat Money Inflation in France: How it Came, What it Brought, and How it Ended Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Letter From Sydney, The Principal Town Of Australasia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBelford's Magazine, Vol II, No. 10, March 1889 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Chainbearer Or, The Littlepage Manuscripts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Law of Civilization and Decay Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEleven Letters- On the Colonies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wealth of Nations: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Malthusian Handbook: Designed to Induce Married People to Limit Their Families Within Their Means Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Revolutionary Period in Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Atlantic Monthly, Volume 01, No. 04, February, 1858 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCetywayo and his White Neighbours Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Political Situation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Slave Trade, Domestic And Foreign Why It Exists, and How It May Be Extinguished Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe White Slaves of England Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJeanne D'Arc Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCetywayo & His White Neighbours: "Truly time should be measured by events, and not by the lapse of hours." Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Right of American Slavery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wealth of Nations Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Redskins; or, Indian and Injin, Volume 1. Being the Conclusion of the Littlepage Manuscripts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThanksgiving Tales Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Laws of Etiquette; Or, Short Rules and Reflections for Conduct in Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 424 Volume 17, New Series, February 14, 1852
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 424 Volume 17, New Series, February 14, 1852 - William Chambers
The Project Gutenberg EBook of Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 424, New
Series, February 14, 1852, by Various
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 424, New Series, February 14, 1852
Author: Various
Editor: Robert Chambers and William Chambers
Release Date: April 5, 2005 [EBook #15549]
Language: English
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EDINBURGH JOURNAL ***
Produced by Malcolm Farmer, Richard J. Shiffer and the PG
Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
CHAMBERS' EDINBURGH JOURNAL
CONTENTS
THE PATTERN NATION.
MY TRAVELLING COMPANION.
POPULAR MUSIC—MAINZER.
A NEWCASTLE PAPER IN 1765-6.
GENIUS FOR EMIGRATION.
EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYED.
ANECDOTE OF THE FIELD OF SHERRIFMUIR.
THINNESS OF A SOAP-BUBBLE.
ENGLISH PLOUGHING.
JOHN BUNYAN AND MINCE-PIES.
FOREST-TEACHINGS.
CONDUCTED BY WILLIAM AND ROBERT CHAMBERS, EDITORS OF 'CHAMBERS'S INFORMATION FOR THE PEOPLE,' 'CHAMBERS'S EDUCATIONAL COURSE,' &c.
THE PATTERN NATION.
Return to Table of Contents
It seems to be the destiny of France to work out all sorts of problems in state and social policy. It may be said to volunteer experiments in government for the benefit of mankind. All kinds of forms it tries, one after the other: each, in turn, is supposed to be the right thing; and when found to be wrong, an effort, fair or unfair, is made to try something else. It would surely be the height of ingratitude not to thank our versatile neighbour for this apparently endless series of experiments.
Unfortunately, the novel projects extemporised by the French are not on all occasions easily laid aside. What they have laid hold on, they cannot get rid of. We have a striking instance of this in the practice of subdividing lands. Forms of state administration may be altered, and after all not much harm done; it is only changing one variety of power at the Tuileries for another. A very different thing is a revolution in the method of holding landed property. Few things are more dangerous than to meddle with laws of inheritance: if care be not taken, the whole fabric of society may be overthrown. The unpleasant predicament which the French have got into on this account is most alarming—far more terrible than the wildest of their revolutions. How they are to get out of it, no man can tell.
Latterly, the world has heard much of Socialism. This is the term applied to certain new and untried schemes of social organisation, by which, among other things, it is proposed to supersede the ordinary rights of property and laws of inheritance—the latter, as is observed, having, after due experience, failed to realise that happiness of condition which was anticipated sixty years ago at their institution. As it is always instructive to look back on the first departure from rectitude, let us say a few words as to how the French fell into their present unhappy position.
At the Revolution of 1789-93, it will be recollected that the laws of primogeniture were overthrown, and it was ordained that in future every man's property should be divided equally among his children at his death: there can be no doubt that considerations of justice and humanity were at the foundation of this new law of inheritance. Hitherto, there had been a great disparity in the condition of high and low: certain properties, descending from eldest son to eldest son, had become enormously large, and were generally ill managed; while prodigious numbers of people had no property at all, and were dependents on feudal superiors. The country was undoubtedly in a bad condition, and some modification of the law was desirable. Reckless of consequences, the system as it stood was utterly swept away, and that of equal partition took its place. About the same period, vast domains belonging to the crown, the clergy, and the nobility, were sequestrated and sold in small parcels; so that there sprang up almost at once a proprietary of quite a new description. Had the law of equal partition been extended only to cases in which there was no testamentary provision, it could not have inflicted serious damage, and would at all events have been consistent with reason and expediency: but it went the length of depriving a parent of the right to distribute his property in the manner he judged best, and handed over every tittle of his earnings in equal shares to his children. One child might be worthless, and another the reverse; no matter—all were to be treated alike. No preference could be shewn, no posthumous reward could be given for general good-conduct or filial respect. In all this, there was something so revolting to common sense, that one feels a degree of wonder that so acute a people as the French should have failed to observe the error into which they were plunging.
For every law, however bad, there is always some justification or plea of necessity. Besides tending to level the position of individuals, the plan of equal distribution of property was said to be justifiable on the ground that there are more than two parties concerned. Society, it was alleged, comes in as a third, and says to the parent: 'You must provide for this son, however worthless; you must not throw him destitute on our hands; for that is to shift the responsibility from yourself, who brought him into the world, to us, who have nothing to do with him.' This plea, more plausible than sound, had its effect. That an occasional wrong might not be inflicted, a great national error, practically injurious, was committed.
A compulsory law of equal division of lands among the children of a deceased proprietor, may be long in revealing its horrors in a country where the redundant population sheds habitually off. In Switzerland, for example, the evil of a subdivision of lands is marked but in a moderate degree—though bad enough in the main—because a certain proportion of each generation emigrates in quest of a livelihood—the young men going off to be mercenary soldiers in Italy, waiters at hotels, and so forth; and the young women to be governesses and domestic servants. France, on the contrary, is the last nation in the world to try the subdivision principle. Its people, with some trifling exceptions, go nowhere, as if affecting to despise all the rest of the world. Contented with moderate fortunes, inclined to make amusement their occupation, unwilling or unable to learn foreign languages, or to care for anything abroad, and having so intense a love of France, that they will not emigrate, they necessarily settle down in a gradually aggregating mass, and are driven to the very last shifts for existence. Only two things have saved the nation from anarchy: the remarkable circumstance of few families consisting of more than two, or