The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee November 30, 1864; A statement of the erroneous claims made by General Schofield, and an exposition of the blunder which opened the battle
()
Related to The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee November 30, 1864; A statement of the erroneous claims made by General Schofield, and an exposition of the blunder which opened the battle
Related ebooks
Chancellorsville and Gettysburg: Campaigns of the Civil War - VI Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Continental Monthly, Vol. 4, No. 5, November, 1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChancellorsville Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reply of the Philadelphia Brigade Association to the Foolish and Absurd Narrative of Lieutenant Frank A. Haskell Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnholy Fire: A Riveting Thriller of the Civil War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Spy of the Rebellion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Fort Henry to Corinth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPersonal recollections and experiences concerning the Battle of Stone River Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBayonets, Balloons & Ironclads: Britain and France Take Sides with the South Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Walk in the Dark: Military Intelligence in the English Civil War, 1642-1646 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Recollections of the Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGeneral Edward Porter Alexander and the Peninsula Campaign: Account of the Battles from His Memoirs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStonewall Jackson and the American Civil War (Civil War Classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Command Is Forward Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFamous War Correspondents (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Spy of the Rebellion (Based on True Events) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsField-Marshall Lord Kitchener, Volume 1 (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStonewall Jackson and the American Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWith Winston Churchill at the Front: Winston in the Trenches, 1916 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the Company of Soldiers: A Chronicle of Combat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life Of Field Marshal Sir Neville Chamberlain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Spy of the Rebellion: True History of the Spy System of the United States Army during the Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGeneral Edward Porter Alexander at Second Manassas: Account of the Battle from His Memoirs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lost Dispatch Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Amazing Civil War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Operation Wappen: A War That Never Was Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChurchill Warrior: How a Military Life Guided Winston's Finest Hours Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Campaign of Chancellorsville Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee November 30, 1864; A statement of the erroneous claims made by General Schofield, and an exposition of the blunder which opened the battle
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee November 30, 1864; A statement of the erroneous claims made by General Schofield, and an exposition of the blunder which opened the battle - John K. Shellenberger
The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee, by
John K. Shellenberger
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee
November 30, 1864; A statement of the erroneous claims
made by General Schofield, and an exposition of the blunder
which opened the battle
Author: John K. Shellenberger
Release Date: March 2, 2010 [EBook #31468]
Language: English
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE BATTLE OF FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE ***
Produced by The Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net. (This file was produced from images
generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian
Libraries.)
THE BATTLE OF
FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE
November 30, 1864
A statement of the erroneous claims made by
General Schofield, and an exposition
of the blunder which opened
the battle
BY
Captain John K. Shellenberger
One hundred, twenty-five
copies privately printed for the author by
THE ARTHUR H. CLARK COMPANY
Cleveland: 1916
PREFACE
This monograph on the Battle of Franklin was read first at a meeting of the Minnesota Commandery of the Loyal Legion, December 9, 1902. Written after an exhaustive investigation begun many years before, the straightforward truth was told without fear or favor. The disgraceful and costly blunder with which the Battle of Franklin opened should have been investigated by a court of inquiry. The only action taken, however, was the deposing of General Wagner, the junior in rank and the weakest in influence among the generals implicated, from the command of his division, with the statement that the blunder was due to his disobedience of orders. With this action the matter was hushed up.
I have no personal grudge against General Schofield, whose obstinate reliance on his ability to foresee what General Hood would do, was the prime cause of the blunder. My feeling towards him is the same that any honest student will experience when he becomes convinced that an undeserved promotion was secured by dishonest methods. I began my investigation with no thought of him but to secure evidence to disprove statements that I knew to be false, dishonoring the brigade to which I belonged. These had been made by General Cox in The March to the Sea—Franklin and Nashville, and by Captain Scofield, a member of Cox’s staff, in a paper entitled The Retreat from Pulaski to Nashville,
published in the second volume of Sketches of War History, issued by the Ohio Commandery of the Loyal Legion.
Misery loves company,
and these two officers of the twenty-third corps, undoubtedly working in collusion, sought to mitigate their misery by putting two brigades of the fourth corps into the same class with their corps, whose battle line had proved unequal to the strain of the two brigades passing over it when driven in from the front by the assaulting rebel army. That part of Cox’s line broke in a panic at the sight of what was coming and abandoned a good line of breastworks before firing a single shot. Cox and Scofield wished to make it appear that the two brigades also became panic stricken and that they never stopped running until they were stopped by the river. That they were both capable of deliberately bearing false witness needs no other proof than that furnished by themselves—by Cox in the contradictory statements made in his two official reports of the Battle of Franklin, and by Scofield in his false map of Spring Hill, which he claimed was drawn to scale, but which he had forged to uphold his claim for extraordinary services rendered by the regiment to which he belonged in the Battle of Spring Hill the day preceding the Battle of Franklin.
The discovery of the discreditable part played by General Schofield in the Battle of Franklin was the greatest find of my investigation. There is not a bit of doubt that he remained heedless at his headquarters in Franklin while the enemy