Cambridge and its Story

Project Gutenberg's Cambridge and its Story, by Charles William Stubbs

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with

almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or

re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included

with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license

Title: Cambridge and its Story

Author: Charles William Stubbs

Illustrator: Herbert Railton

             Fanny Railton

Release Date: September 18, 2013 [EBook #43764]

Language: English

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CAMBRIDGE AND ITS STORY ***

Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was

produced from images available at The Internet Archive)

C A M B R I D G E

AND ITS STORY

All rights reserved

C A M B R I D G E

A N D   I T S   S T O R Y

BY

CHARLES   WILLIAM   STUBBS, D.D.

DEAN OF ELY

WITH TWENTY-FOUR LITHOGRAPHS

AND OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS BY

HERBERT  RAILTON

THE LITHOGRAPHS BEING

TINTED BY

FANNY   RAILTON

1903

LONDON

J.   M.   DENT   &   CO.

A L D I N E   H O U S E, W. C.

Printed by

Ballantyne, Hanson & Co.

At the Ballantyne Press

PREFACE

I SHOULD wish to write one word by way of explanation of the character of the descriptive historical sketch which forms the text of the present book.

Some time ago I undertook to prepare, for the Mediæval Towns Series of my Publisher, a work on the Story of the Town and University of Cambridge. Arrangements were made with Mr. Herbert Railton for its pictorial illustration. It had been intended in the first instance, that the artist’s pen and ink sketches should have been reproduced by the ordinary processes used in modern book illustration. But the poetic glamour of such a place as Cambridge and its genius loci did not allow the enthusiasm of the artist to remain satisfied with such drawings only as might be readily reproduced by the ordinary processes. In addition to many sketches in black and white, suitable for reproduction in the body of the text in illustration of interesting bits of architectural detail, or of quaint grouping, Mr. Railton has also drawn a series of large-sized pencil-pictures of the principal College buildings. These drawings are so beautiful, so full of delicacy and tenderness and yet so firm and effective in their treatment of light and shade, and show so much sympathy for the old buildings and all their picturesque charm, that the Publisher at once felt that they must not be treated as ordinary book illustrations. The artist had produced pictures worthy to be classed with the best work of Samuel Prout. It became the duty of the Publisher to treat them with corresponding respect. The method of auto-lithography has accordingly been adopted, by which the plates are an absolute reproduction in size and tint of the pencil drawings, and the artist’s work goes straight to the reader without any mechanical intervention. A new feature has been added by which the colour stones have been made by Mrs. Railton acting in collaboration with her husband. This process of reproduction necessarily involved a change in the proposed format of the book. It was determined, therefore, to issue in the first instance an edition de luxe of The Story of Cambridge, on specially prepared paper and in large quarto size. I have readily consented to such a course, for although I may seem, by the more imposing form of a large Library Edition, to be guilty of some presumption in placing my Historical Sketch in competition with such histories as those of Mr. Mullinger in the Epochs of History Series, or of my friend, Mr. T. D. Atkinson, in Cambridge Described—the larger books of Mr. J. W. Clark on the architectural history of Cambridge, and of Mr. Mullinger on the general history of the University are already classics to which humbler writers on Cambridge can only look as to final authorities—I can only hope that my readers will recognise that my presumption is only apparent, and meanwhile I rest confident that even the historical critic will have little care for the inadequacy of my prose rendering of The Story of Cambridge, absorbed as he must be by his delight in the beauty of Mr. Railton’s drawings. In any case, I shall be entirely satisfied if only my descriptive sketch is found adequate for the help of the general reader in appreciating the story of which the artist has been able to give so poetic an interpretation.

C. W. S.

The Deanery, Ely,

Michaelmas, 1903.

CONTENTS

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

TINTED LITHOGRAPHS

BLACK AND WHITE ILLUSTRATIONS

CHAPTER I

LEGENDARY ORIGIN OF THE UNIVERSITY

"Next then the plenteous Ouse came far from land,

By many a city and by many a town,

And many rivers taking under-hand

Into his waters as he passeth down,

The Cle, the Were, the Grant, the Sture, the Bowne,

Thence doth by Huntingdon and Cambridge flit,

My Mother Cambridge, whom as with a crowne

He doth adorne, and is adorn’d by it

With many a gentle Muse and many a learned wit."

—

Spenser’s

Faerie Queene, iv. xi. 34.

Geographical and commercial importance of the city site—Map of the county a palimpsest—Glamour of the Fenland—Cambridge the gateway of East Anglia—The Roman roads—The Roman station—The Castle Hill—Stourbridge Fair—Cambridge a chief centre of English commerce.

ONE could wish perhaps that the story of Cambridge should begin, as so many good stories of men and cities have begun, in the antique realm of poetry and romance. That it did so begin our forefathers indeed had little doubt. John Lydgate, the poet, a Benedictine monk of Bury, the disciple—as he is proud to call himself—of Geoffrey Chaucer, but best remembered perhaps by later times as the writer of London Lackpenny and Troy Book, has left certain verses on the foundation of the Town and University of Cambridge, which are still preserved to us.[1] Some stanzas of that fourteenth-century poem will serve to show in what a cloudland of empty legend it was at one time thought that the story of the beginnings of Cambridge might be found:—

"By trew recorde of the Doctor Bede

That some tyme wrotte so mikle with his hande,

And specially remembringe as I reede

In his chronicles made of England

Amounge other thynges as ye shall understand,

Whom for myne aucthour I dare alleage,

Seith the translacion and buylding of Cambridge.

. . . . . . . . . .

"Touching the date, as I rehearse can

Fro thilke tyme that the world began

Four thowsand complete by accomptès clere

And three hundred by computacion

Joyned thereto eight and fortie yeare,

When Cantebro gave the foundacion

Of thys citie and this famous towne

And of this noble universitie

Sette on this river which is called Cante.

. . . . . . . . . .

"This Cantebro, as it well knoweth

At Athenes scholed in his yougt,

All his wyttes greatlye did applie

To have acquaintance by great affection

With folke-experte in philosophie.

From Athens he brought with hym downe

Philosophers most sovereigne of renowne

Unto Cambridge, playnlye this is the case,

Anaxamander and Anaxagoras

With many other myne Aucthors dothe fare,

To Cambridge fast can hym spede

With philosophers and let for no cost spare

In the Schooles to studdie and to reede;

Of whose teachinges great profit that gan spreade

And great increase rose of his doctrine;

Thus of Cambridge the name gan first shyne

As chief schoole and universitie

Unto this tyme fro the daye it began

By cleare reporte in manye a far countre

Unto the reign of Cassibellan.

. . . . . . . . . .

"And as it is put eke in memorie,

Howe Julius Cesar entring this region

On Cassybellan after his victorye

Tooke with hym clarkes of famous renowne

Fro Cambridg and ledd theim to Rome towne,

Thus by processe remembred here to forne

Cambridg was founded long or Chryst was borne."

But it is not only in verse that this fabric of fable is to be found. Down even to the middle of the last century the ears of Cambridge graduates were still beguiled by strange stories of the early renown of their University—how it was founded by a Spanish Prince, Cantaber (the Cantebro of Lydgate’s verses), in the 4321st year of the creation of the world, and in the sixth year of Gurgant, King of Britain; how Athenian astronomers and philosophers, because of the pleasantness of the place, came to Cambridge as its earliest professors, the king having appointed them stipends; how King Arthur, on the 7th of April, in the year of the Incarnacion of our Lord, 531, granted a charter of academic privileges to Kenet, the first Rector of the schools; and how the University subsequently found another royal patron in the East Anglian King Sigebert, and had among its earliest Doctors of Divinity the great Saxon scholars Bede and Alcuin.

I have before me as I write a small octavo volume, a guide-book to Cambridge and its Colleges, much worn and thumbed, probably by its eighteenth-century owner, possibly by his nineteenth-century successor, in which all these fables and legends are set out in order. The book has lost its title-page, but it is easily identifiable as an English translation of Richard Parker’s Skeletos Cantabrigiensis, written about 1622, but not apparently published until a century later, when the antiquary, Thomas Hearne, printed it in his edition of Leland’s Collectanea. My English edition of the Skeletos is presumably either that which was printed for Thomas Warner at the Black Boy, Pater Noster Row, and without a date, or that published by J. Bateman at the Hat and Star in S. Paul’s Churchyard, and dated 1721. As an illustration of the kind of record which passed for history even in the last century,—for the early editions of Hallam’s History of the Middle Ages bear evidence that that careful historian still gave some credence to these Cambridge fables,—it may be interesting to quote one or two passages from the legendary history of Nicholas Cantelupe, which is prefixed to this English version of Parker’s book:—

"Anaximander, one of the disciples of Thales, came to this city on account of his Philosophy and great Skill in Astrology, where he left much Improvement in Learning to Posterity. After his Example, Anaxagoras, quitting his Possessions, after a long Peregrination, came to Cambridge, where he writ Books, and instructed the unlearned, for which reason that City was by the People of the Country call’d the City of

Scholars

.

"King Cassibelan, when he had taken upon him the Government of the Kingdom, bestowed such Preheminence on this City, that any Fugitive or Criminal, desirous to acquire Learning, flying to it, was defended in the sight of His Enemy, with Pardon, and without Molestation, Upbraiding or Affront offer’d him. For which Reason, as also on account of the Richness of the Soil, the Serenity of the Air, the great Source of Learning, and the King’s Favour, young and old, from many Parts of the Earth, resorted thither, some of whom

Julius Cæsar

, having vanquished Cassibelan, carry’d away to Rome, where they afterwards flourish’d."

There then follows a letter, given without any doubt of authenticity, from Alcuin of York, purporting to be written to the scholars of Cambridge from the Court of Charles the Great:—

"To the discreet Heirs of

Christ

, the Scholars of the unspotted Mother Cambridge, Ælqninus, by Life a Sinner, Greeting and Glory in the Virtues of Learning. Forasmuch as Ignorance is the Mother of Error, I earnestly intreat that Youths among you be us’d to be present at the Praises of the Supreme King, not to unearth Foxes, not to hunt Hares, let them now learn the Holy Scriptures, having obtain’d Knowledge of the Science of Truth, to the end that in their perfect Age they may teach others. Call to mind, I beseech you dearly beloved the most noble Master of our Time, Bede the Priest, Doctor of your University, under whom by permission of the Divine Grace, I took the Doctor’s Degree in the Year from the Incarnation of our Lord 692, what an Inclination he had to study in His Youth, what Praise he has now among Men, and much more what Glory of Reward with God. Farewell always in Christ Jesu, by whose Grace you are assisted in Learning. Amen."

We may omit the mythical charter of King Arthur and come to the passage concerning King Alfred, obviously intended to turn the flank of the Oxford patriots, who too circumstantially relate how their University was founded by that great scholar king.

"In process of time, when Alfred, or Alred, supported by divine Comfort, after many Tribulations, had obtained the Monarchy of all England, he translated to Oxford the scholars, which Penda, King of the Mercians, had with the leave of King Ceadwald carried from Cambridge to Kirneflad (rather Cricklade, as above), to which scholars he was wont to distribute Alms in three several Places. He much honour’d the Cantabrigians and Oxonians, and granted them many Privileges.

Afterwards he erected and establish’d Grammar Schools throughout the whole Island, and caus’d the Youth to be instructed in their Mother Tongue. Then perceiving that the Scholars, whom he had conveyed to Oxford, continually applied themselves to the Study of the Laws and expounded the Holy Scriptures: he appointed Grimwald their Rector, who had been Rector and Chancellor of the City of Cambridge.

The severer canons of modern historical criticism have naturally made short work of all these absurd fables; nor do they even allow us to accept as authentic the otherwise not unpleasing story quoted from the Chronicle, or rather historical novel, of Ingulph, in the quaint pages of Thomas Fuller, written a generation later than Richard Parker’s book, which tells how, early in the twelfth century, certain monks were sent to Cambridge by Joffrey, Abbot of Crowland, to expound in a certain public barn (by later writers fondly thought to be that which is now known by the name of Pythagoras’ School) the pages of Priscian, Quintillian, and Aristotle.

There is little doubt, I fear, that we may find the inciting motive of all this exuberant fancy and invention in the desire to glorify the one University at the expense of the other, which is palpably present in that last quotation from Parker’s book, and which is perhaps not altogether absent from the writings and the conversation of some academic patriots of our own day. We may, however, more wisely dismiss all these foolish legends and myths as to origins in the kindlier spirit of quaint old Fuller in the Introduction to his History of the University of Cambridge:—

Sure I am, he says, there needeth no such pains to be took, or provision to be made, about the pre-eminence of our English Universities, to regulate their places, they having better learned humility from the precept of the Apostle, In honour preferring one another. Wherefore I presume my aunt Oxford will not be justly offended if in this book I give my own mother the upper hand, and first begin with her history. Thus desiring God to pour his blessing upon both, that neither may want milk for their children, or children for their milk, we proceed to the business.

Descending then from the misty cloudland of Fable to the hard ground of historic Fact, we are shortly met by a question which, I hope, Fuller would have recognised as businesslike. How did it come about that our forefathers founded a University on the site which we now call Cambridge—that distant marsh town, as a