The Shape of Things to Come: Prophecy and the American Voice

By Greil Marcus

From the author of Mystery Train and Lipstick Traces, an exhilarating and provocative investigation of the tangle of American identity

"America is a place and a story, made up of exuberance and suspicion, crime and liberation, lynch mobs and escapes; its greatest testaments are made of portents and warnings, biblical allusions that lose all certainty in the American air." It is this story of self-invention and nationhood that Greil Marcus rediscovers, beginning with John Winthrop's invocation of America as a "city on the hill," Lincoln's second inaugural address, and Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech about his American dream. Listening to these prophetic founding statements, Marcus explores America's promise as a New Jerusalem and the nature of its covenant: first with God, and then with its own citizens. In the nineteenth century, this vision of the nation's story was told in public as part of common discourse, to be fought over in plain speech and flights of gorgeous rhetoric. Since then, Marcus argues, it has become cryptic, a story told more in art than in politics. He traces it across the continent and through time, hearing the tale in the disparate voices of writers, filmmakers, performers, and actors: Philip Roth, David Lynch, David Thomas, Allen Ginsberg, Sheryl Lee, and Bill Pullman. In The Shape of Things to Come, the future and the past merge in extraordinary and uncanny ways, and Marcus proves once again that he is our most imaginative and original cultural critic.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Macmillan Publishers
• Release date: Aug 21, 2007
• ISBN: 9781466804227

Greil Marcus

Greil Marcus is an American author, music journalist and cultural critic. He is notable for producing scholarly and literary essays that place rock music in a much broader framework of culture and politics than is customary in pop music journalism. He writes for newspapers and magazines including Rolling Stone and The Village Voice.

Book preview

Prologue

New York, Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania

These are the voices I found when, a few days after terrorists attacked American cities, I was asked to write about what happened. It seemed presumptuous to say anything, and in any case I had nothing to say. I listened instead.

Where is the building? Did it fall down? Where is it?

—Joe Disordo, on the collapse of Two World Trade Center, describing his escape from One World Trade Center, New York Times, 16 September 2001

Looking down they could see the last convulsions: the lights of the cars were darting through the streets, like animals trapped in a maze, frantically seeking an exit, the bridges were jammed with cars, the approaches to the bridges were veins of massed headlights, glittering bottlenecks stopping all motion, and the desperate screaming of sirens reached faintly to the height of the plane…

The plane was above the peaks of the skyscrapers when suddenly, with the abruptness of a shudder, as if the ground had parted to engulf it, the city disappeared from the face of the earth. It took them a moment to realize that the panic had reached the power stations—and that the lights of New York had gone out.

—Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, 1957

Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon. The sky was blue. The birds were singing. And the bastards were finally going to get what was coming to them.

I say I even though I didn’t actually bomb the Pentagon—we bombed it, in the sense that Weathermen organized and claimed it…

Some details cannot be told. Some friends and comrades have been in prison for decades; others, including Bernadine, spent months and months locked up for refusing to talk or give handwriting samples to federal grand juries. Consequences are real for people, and that’s part of this story, too. But the government was dead wrong, and we were right. In our conflict we don’t talk; we don’t tell. We never confess.

When activists were paraded before grand juries, asked to name names, to humiliate themselves and to participate in destroying the movement, most refused and went to jail rather than say a word. Outside they told the press, I didn’t do it, but I dug it. I recall John Brown’s strategy over a century ago—he shot all the members of the grand jury investigating his activities in Kansas.

—Bill Ayers, Fugitive Days, September 2001

You don’t know where she is? I asked again. He shrugged again, and I said, OK. I let the automatic dangle from my hand as I waited for the sound of a jet making its final approach over the motel. Last chance, I said before the noise got too loud for him to hear. He shrugged again. You know I’m not going to kill you, don’t you? I said. He shook his head, but his eyes smiled. He might be a piece of shit but Jackson had some balls on him. Either that or he was more frightened of his business associates than he was of me. That was a real mistake on his part. When the landing jet swept over the motel, I leaned down and pumped two rounds into his right foot.

You didn’t have to shoot him twice, Trahearne said.

Once to get his attention, I said, and once to let him know I was serious.

—James Crumley, The Last Good Kiss, 1978

The terrorist attacks were major atrocities. In scale, they may not reach the level of many others—for example, Clinton’s 1998 bombing of the Sudan with no credible pretext, destroying half its pharmaceutical supplies and killing unknown numbers of people.

—Noam Chomsky, 11 September 2001

Over the years since the seizure of the American embassy in Tehran in 1979, the [American] public has become tolerably familiar with the idea that there are Middle Easterners of various shades and stripes who do not like them…

With cell phones still bleeping piteously from under the rubble, it probably seems indecent to most people to ask if the United States has ever done anything to attract such awful hatred.

—Christopher Hitchens, Guardian (London), 13 September 2001

What we saw on Tuesday, terrible as it is, could be minuscule if, in fact, God continues to lift the curtain and allow the enemies of America to give us probably what we deserve…The abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked. And when we destroy forty million little innocent babies, we make God mad. I really believe that the pagans, the abortionists, the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the A.C.L.U., People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America, I point the finger in their face and say, You helped this happen.

—The Reverend Jerry Falwell, The 700 Club, 13 September 2001

The responsibility for violence lies with those who perpetrate it.

—Salman Rushdie, In Good Faith, 1990

The water was rising, got up in my bed

Lord, the water was rolling, got up to my bed

I thought I would take a trip, Lord, out on the days I slept.

—Charley Patton, High Water Everywhere Part II, 1929

I was stranded in Chicago until late last night. On the runway in Newark on Monday at 8 a.m.—that was OK by one day; on the runway at O’Hare on Tuesday at 8.30—that wasn’t so great. The airport shut down, and we were left to make our way into a chaotic Chicago of semi-evacuation. After three days and five plane reservations cancelled, I finally found a car and drove home. Eight hundred miles of flags, licenses from everywhere and bumper stickers like MY PRESIDENT IS CHARLTON HESTON and HOW’S MY DRIVING / DIAL 1-800-EAT-SHIT. With my finger on the pulse of the nation, I pulled in about 10 p.m.

—Hal Foster, Princeton, New Jersey, e-mail, 15 September 2001

For the first time in America, except during the Civil War and the World War, people were afraid to say whatever came to their tongues. On the streets, on trains, at theaters, men looked about to see who might be listening before they dared so much as say there was a drought in the West, for someone might suppose they were blaming the drought on the Chief!…

Every moment everyone felt fear, nameless and omnipresent. They were as jumpy as men in a plague district. Any sudden sound, any unexplained footstep, any unfamiliar script on an envelope, made them startle; and for months they never felt secure enough to let themselves go, in complete sleep.

—Sinclair Lewis, It Can’t Happen Here, 1935

Gloom and sadness and bereavement just hang in the air. My local firemen were killed, and the whole area is plastered with missing-people flyers: someone’s little daughter who had accompanied her mother to work, endless husbands and wives and daughters and sons and best friends; destroyed people.

—Emily Marcus, Charles Street and Greenwich Avenue, Manhattan, e-mail, 15 September 2001

High water rising, rising night and day

All the gold and silver are being stolen away

Big Joe Turner looking east and west from the dark room of his mind

He made it to Kansas City, Twelfth Street and Vine

Nothing standing there.

—Bob Dylan, High Water (For Charley Patton), September 2001

The ship? Great God, where is the ship?

—Herman Melville, Moby-Dick, 1851

The Barking Dog

America is a place and a story, made up of exuberance and suspicion, crime and liberation, lynch mobs and escapes; its greatest testaments are made of portents and warnings, Biblical allusions that lose all their certainties in American air. A dog, a dog, as David Lynch wrote in a song called Pink Western Range, barking like Robert Johnson.

The story of America as told from the beginning is one of self-invention and nationhood, and before and after the formal founding of the nation, the template, in its simplest, starkest terms, came in the voice of God from the Book of Amos, calling out to the Children of Israel: You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. From John Winthrop in 1630, with A Modell of Christian Charity, describing the mission of the Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Company, to Abraham Lincoln in 1865, delivering his Second Inaugural Address, to Martin Luther King, Jr., ninety-eight years later, speaking on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, America has told itself that story. Whether America has heard itself in these prophetic voices—voices that were raised to keep faith with the past, or with the future to which the past committed their present—is another question.

The Children of Israel made a covenant with God, to keep his commandments, obey his rules, and follow the path of righteousness; the covenant and nothing else made them a nation. The promises they made were not made to be broken; because one people and no other had made a covenant with God, the stakes were much higher. The promises were made to be betrayed, which meant that when one betrayed the promise, one betrayed God. In the Israel of Isaiah and Jeremiah, as the land fell into misery and sin, prophets stepped forward to speak in God’s name, to warn the people that as in their covenant they had been promised God’s greatest blessings, should they betray their covenant they would suffer the greatest torments; as they had offered themselves to his judgment, so they would be judged. America began as a reenactment of this drama, Amos’s words echoing over Fitzgerald’s phylogenetic American memory of a fresh, green breast of the new world.

The Puritans carried the sense of themselves as God’s people to America as they found it; that sense, armed, is what is called American exceptionalism. It re-creates the nation as a voice of power and self-righteousness, speaking to itself in a message broadcast to the whole world. This is an original and fundamental part of American identity; there is no American identity without it, which is also to say there is no American identity without a sense of portent and doom. This is the other side of the story: the urge of the nation, in the shape of a certain kind of American hero, to pass judgment on itself. Israel had the comfort of knowing that should it betray its covenant, God would be the judge; in America, a covenant a few people once made with themselves, a covenant the past made with the future and that every present maintains with both the future and the past, passing that judgment on America is everyone’s burden and liberation. It’s what it means to be a citizen; all of citizenship, all taxes and freedoms, flows from that obligation. To be obliged to judge one’s country is also to have the right to do it.

This story, once public and part of common discourse, something to fight over in flights of gorgeous rhetoric and blunt plain speech, has long since become spectral; it is now cryptic. To the degree that it is worth the telling, it is a story told more in art than in politics, even if it is at the heart of our politics—our ongoing struggle to define what the nation is and what it is for. In the nineteenth century, along with Melville and Hawthorne, Emerson and Harriet Beecher Stowe, Frederick Douglass and Edgar Allan Poe, politicians and preachers asked if the country understood the nature of its covenant. They asked if the country understood the price that would be paid if the covenant were to be broken, or the price to be paid if the fact that the covenant had already been broken, a fact buried under generations of patriotic speeches and prayers, proved to be impossible to hide.

The Jews Are Not the Only People Who Built the Tombs of the Prophets

At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? Abraham Lincoln asked the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois, early in 1838. He was just short of twenty-nine, a first-term representative in the state legislature; he was addressing a self-improvement society.

Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.

He went back to his question: At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.

From long before Lincoln’s time, up to our own and certainly past it, pious and self-promoting denunciations of the corruptions breeding within the republic have been and will be part of the republic’s speech: Unless we rid ourselves of this stain, those parasites, this perversion, these impostors of virtue who claim to speak in our name—then doom, goes the litany, and deservedly so. The old story—and the heart of what Lincoln was to talk about that night. He was right, as anyone is right when he or she raises this flag. But finally, after more than a century and a half, during which the United States became a world power, and then the most powerful nation in the world, he was proven wrong.

U.S. Attacked, read the headline in the New York Times on 12 September 2001, and it was a remarkable choice of words. It was no matter that the attackers were not Lincoln’s army of Europe, Asia, or Africa, but a mere nineteen Muslim terrorists directed from a mountain retreat in Afghanistan. The writer understood that a brilliantly planned conspiracy, an almost perfectly executed, astonishingly spectacular assault, the hijacking and then smashing of planes into the two towers of the World Trade Center in New York, a third into the Pentagon, with the last plane, headed for the Capitol, brought down in Pennsylvania by its passengers after they learned what had already happened, was first of all symbolic. The writer understood that the deaths of thousands of people going about their business, whatever that might be, were necessary to validate the symbolism, and that the intent of the perpetrators was to instantly reveal mere buildings as representative of the country, and thus symbolically enact the destruction of the nation itself. More starkly, more truthfully than any of those who over the next days and weeks gave speeches, wrote essays, or delivered sermons, whoever composed the headline captured all this as if in a two-word poem.

More than any other place on earth, America can be attacked through its symbols because it is made up. It is a construct, an idea, and as from the beginning to this day it is still seeking to construct, to shape, whoever finds himself or herself on its ground. The nation exists as power, but its only legitimacy is found in a few pieces of paper. Take away the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and perhaps various public speeches that lie behind those documents or pass them on, and as a nation you have little more than a collection of buildings and people who have no special reason to speak to each other, and nothing to say.

If the nation is a construct, though, as it was made up it can be unmade; the September terrorists may have understood that. As a construct, America exists by means of its symbols, and if those symbols are destroyed—destroy one, destroy them all, the American way, buy one, get one free—the idea is suddenly exposed as nothing more than that. A few agreements made more than two centuries ago make up the contract that binds all Americans to each other and to the nation as such, which is to say they are all that binds them, that they are all the nation is. The notion that people can validate themselves through a few words denying tyranny, affirming equality, and insisting that any individual has rights no power can grant or take away—what we call freedom—is itself as much a symbol as it is a way of life, and so it too can be attacked as a symbol. It’s a crude, backward reading—If your power can be denied so terribly and so swiftly, what is the power of your idea?—though not so far from our own primitive, backward translation: Behold our power, tremble before our idea. In their emptiness, both versions make plain how unlikely and odd the idea is.

The idea is that of a country inventing itself, staging the old play about a chosen people and their covenant with their god—but as the country took shape and announced itself as a nation, the ground shifted. America became a country that was a nation because it had made a covenant with itself. It made certain promises about who its citizens might be, how they might live, and for what purposes. Though the blessings of God were called upon, and intimations of his judgment summoned, it was never about God. If the country betrayed its promises, it would betray itself; each citizen would find himself or herself betrayed by every other.

The promises made in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution—the promise that all would find themselves free to say what they had to say, the guarantee of equal justice under law, that governments were formed to respect and protect those rights, that citizens owed governments no respect if they did not—were so great that their betrayal was part of the promise. We’re living in this non-fiction culture, we’re living in a world that comforts itself with what we believe to be fact, the novelist A. M. Homes said to an interviewer in 2004. "And yet, the history of this country, the best parts of its history, from its founding to its best political campaigns, and so on, we built on fantasy—and on promise, and on hope, on an ideal of something rather than on something we could prove." The betrayal of that ideal became the national drama, the engine of American history, from the day the documents were promulgated—the discovery that the promises one had been made were false, the attempt to make them true, battles over slavery and suffrage, property and speech, for all time. As it was inevitable that the promises the nation had made would be betrayed, it was inevitable that America would produce prophetic figures of its own.

They were not there to predict the future any more than the Old Testament prophets were. Predicting the future is soothsaying; prophecy has more to do with the past than the future. America’s prophets prophesy one thing: as God once judged the Children of Israel, America has to judge itself. It’s a coincidence that "Love and Theft, the album that carried Bob Dylan’s song High Water," was released on 11 September 2001; albums are released on Tuesdays, and this one could just as well have appeared on September 4 or September 18. But the mood of the song, the way it was sung, the words that made up fragments of a story that remained incomplete—a disaster, people fleeing for their lives, others seizing on the chance to change their names, make a quick buck, or settle old scores—were not a coincidence. America makes its promises and betrays them with great events and muttered curses, with heroic poses and tiny gestures; its judgments on itself are sometimes shouted and inescapable, sometimes will-o’-the-wisp and almost silent.

Before Lincoln all of this was part of political speech. All sorts of public actors affirmed the American covenant, its promise and its betrayal; at their best, as with Douglass in his oration What to the Slave Is Your Fourth of July?, they explored the betrayal as a dramatization of the promise. Need I tell you that the Jews are not the only people who built the tombs of the prophets? Douglass said to the Rochester Ladies’ Anti-slavery Society on 5 July 1852, speaking both of your nation and of my fellow citizens—even Fellow citizens! Washington could not die till he had broken the chains of his slaves. Yet his monument is built up by the price of human blood. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake, he said of what it would take to rid the nation of its hypocrisies. What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence. He called down Isaiah, speaking the word of God:

Bring no more vain ablations; incense is an abomination unto me; the new moons and Sabbaths, the calling of assemblies, I cannot away with; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. Your new moons and your appointed feasts my soul hateth. They are a trouble to me; I am weary to bear them; and when ye spread forth your hands I will hide mine eyes from you. Yea! When ye make many prayers, I will not hear. Your hands are full of blood; cease to do evil, learn to do well; seek judgment.

Fifty-three years ago, the Fourth of July was a proud day for our country, the abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison said on 4 July 1829. It clearly and accurately defined the rights of man; it made no vulgar alterations in the established usages of society; it presented a revelation adapted to the common sense of mankind…it gave an impulse to the heart of the world, which yet thrills to its extremities. But slavery and the law and the prophets made it all a mockery, he said: Before God I must say that such a glaring contradiction as exists between our creed and practice the annals of six thousand years cannot parallel. He and his audience had the work before them, he said; even if generations of blacks…go down to the grave, manacled and lacerated, without a hope for their children…victory will be obtained, worth the desperate struggle of a thousand years.

Or, if defeat follow, woe to the safety of this people! The nation will be shaken as if by a mighty earthquake. A cry of horror, a cry of revenge, will go up to heaven in the darkness of midnight, and re-echo from every cloud. Blood will flow like water…The terrible judgments of an incensed God will complete the catastrophe of republican America.

I tremble for my country, Jefferson famously said in Notes on the State of Virginia in 1781, in words chiseled on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial, when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever. George Mason wrote the Virginia Declaration of Rights, which Jefferson drew on for the Declaration of Independence. The laws of impartial Providence, Mason wrote in 1774 to the Virginia legislature on the question of slavery, may avenge our injustice upon our posterity.

After Lincoln—because, one can imagine, he finally went too far, rendering judgment in words so violent and unforgiving it is sometimes hard to credit that they survive at all, let alone that they remain chiseled in huge letters on an inside wall of a giant monument, where they sit, to be read and considered, to frighten or inspire, or gazed at as if they were no more than a verbal statue and just as mute—few politicians or preachers have dared to suggest that the nation was made to judge itself in a court the country would have to convene over and over again. If we fail to oppose an evil as obvious as torture—it is an evil and it is obvious it is wrong—then as President Thomas Jefferson said, I will ‘tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just,’ Harry Reid of Nevada said on the floor of the Senate on 3 February 2005, the day the Senate confirmed Alberto Gonzales, who as White House counsel had advised on the permissibility of torture as the policy of the nation, as attorney general of the United States. There was no reflection on what Reid said; what he said was ignored, and the language in which he said what he said was taken as mere literary allusion, probably dug up by some eager-beaver intern from Elko or Virginia City, the furthest thing from an idea, or even an echo. Since Lincoln, the drama in which the country judges itself, asks itself what it really is, what it is for, measures the promise by its betrayal and the betrayal by the promise, has been played out most intensely in art: in speech and acts that begin with a single citizen—a single imaginary citizen, a character made up by a novelist, a singer, a filmmaker, a performer—saying what he or she has to say, as if there are others attending to those acts and speech, even though there may be none. I claim my birthright! Allen Ginsberg said in his 1966 Vietnam War poem Wichita Vortex Sutra, speaking into a tape recorder in the back of a Volkswagen bus in Kansas, dead center in the U.S.A.: A lone man talking to myself, no house in the brown vastness to hear / imagining the throng of Selves / that make this nation one body of Prophecy. This book is an attempt to travel through that throng of selves, to listen to what they say—and as much to attend to how they say what they say, to attend to a conversation of gestures, exclamations, whispers, damns and praises and jokes. Out of a throng of selves, what is one body of prophecy? Before it is anything else it is a single American, claiming his or her birthright, as a single body standing in, if only for a moment, for all other Americans. People are out there; someone has to hear. And then what? Then, if the chord is struck truly, the throng of Selves / that make this nation one body of Prophecy appears.

For years now, since perhaps the end of the first Bush presidency, when Bill Clinton’s election—or the prospect that twelve years of rule by those who never admitted to doubt, for whom American promises were catchphrases and betrayals were always those of someone else, might be ending—gave many people a kind of breathing space, where they could discover that the country was still daring them to act out the country’s drama for themselves, this throng of selves has been assembling itself. It leans toward a void: the artist’s sense that America must judge itself, that it can describe itself only by judging itself, that it not only admits to but revels in the instability of a place made up out of an idea, that it revels in its own urge toward self-destruction. The stories I will try to follow are from this time, but my bet is that they are not time-bound; again and again, shadowed by the prophetic speeches of a few ancestors, of recent memory or barely known at all, they call up the whole expanse of the country’s history, its struggle to tell its story.

These stories can be found in work as self-consciously weighty as the novels Philip Roth published from 1997 to 2004, from American Pastoral to The Plot Against America, or in efforts as weightless as the facial expressions of the B-movie actress Sheryl Lee—a few seconds on the screen forming the vortex of a play about self-abasement and shame that only the vortex reveals to have been under way at all. They are present in the blocked gestures of the actor Bill Pullman, which together make a picture of a country that has used itself up. They can be found in the country singer Martina McBride’s 1994 single Independence Day or in the flailing, frightening songs made in the early 1990s by the two-woman punk band Heavens to Betsy. Artists who work as they do don’t trumpet betrayals or warn of danger; they sense the presence of such things, and seek them in their roles like moles in the ground. More like Roth—in his fashioning of an America where a settled landscape of virtue and possibility changes back into a frontier of temptation and ruin—others feel for the role of prophet as such; these are the people who can imagine that they actually do embody the nation and, with the proper disguises, that they can speak for it. There is Ginsberg for one, trying desperately to burn off whatever irony his hipster’s credentials allow him, speaking in as unimpressed a tone as he can manage without forgetting his post as keeper of the country’s laughter and its screams. For another there is the singer and bandleader David Thomas, performing as a buffoon—because the throng of selves, no matter how much it might make one body of prophecy, is also just that, a throng, made up of busy people running in all directions, with no time to stop to sign your petition or take your leaflet or tell you how to get where you’re going, and there is something inherently ridiculous in trying to convince the members of the throng that everything they know is wrong, that everything they believe is false. This is, after all, what a prophet does, and it is what the movie director David Lynch does, more heedlessly and more resentfully, with more gaudiness and austerity, than anyone else, here and there more than anything like an evangelist, if one can imagine Elmer Gantry and Aimee Semple McPherson on a joint national revival tour, prefacing their sermons with a screening of their own porn movie.

It is a drama of foreboding. It is first set out, as I will try to set it out here, as an appeal to the community, then to the republic, with all citizens symbolically present, the dead represented by the living, the living taking their legitimacy from the dead, and both standing in for those to follow. Then, as political speakers politely turn their backs or flee in cowardice from the terror the drama places on anyone who dares to face it, the drama is played out in what appear to be smaller theaters, with characters from this or that made-up story now standing for the community, but I think the drama is the same. The country remakes itself again and again by means of the tension between its promises and their betrayal—but a suspicion that one day the country may push its luck too far is what makes the story any kind of drama at all. Everyone I’ve mentioned, from Lincoln to Sheryl Lee, takes stage directions from D. H. Lawrence: At the bottom of the American soul was always a dark suspense.

Massachusetts, Washington, D.C.

Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You only have I known of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities…Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? Shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? Surely the Lord God will do nothing but, he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. The lion hath roared, who will not fear? The Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy?

Through three public speeches, from Winthrop, Lincoln, and King, we can hear the prophet Amos’s voice taken up again and again. A chain can be made—a golden chain, for the heat of vision in each address, but also an iron chain, because in each case there is an appeal to an absolute: the prophet speaks for nothing else. The American blessing or curse—the terror or embrace that is found as a reward—is to live out that absolute, or live in its shadow.

The three speeches are classics, touchstones, quoted or anthologized everywhere. Winthrop’s A Modell of Christian Charity was a lay sermon, dated 1630, delivered, it is usually said, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, on the ship Arbella, to the members of the Massachusetts Bay Company. It was a sermon about the founding they were about to enact—though some words in the text suggest that the sermon was delivered before the Puritans left England (the times of persecution here in England), or after they arrived in the New World (whatsoever we did or ought to have done when we lived in England). It is possible it was never delivered at all. Written on Boarde the Arrabella, On the Attlantick Ocean. By the Honorable John Winthrop Esquire. In His passage, (with the great Company of Religious people, of which Christian Tribes he was the Brave Leader and famous Governor;) from the Island of Great Brittaine, to New-England in the North America, the manuscript reads, but the fanfare aside there is no mention in Winthrop’s diary of his ever presenting the speech. It may be that as a public address Winthrop’s words entered history as a private document, a fantasy of

Reviews for The Shape of Things to Come

[dneyal · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

so beautiful novel

[tiepeck · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

Amazing

[Adam · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

Eliza j b

[matthew.ducmanas · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

There are few books that- as soon as I've finished it- I could conceivably start re-reading immediately. One such book was William T. Vollmann's Imperial. Even though it was a heavy tome of a book, Volmmann wrote about Imperial County (and by extension- the American Project as a whole) in such a completely beguiling and feverish way that the pages flowed by swiftly. Though much shorter, Greil Marcus' The Shape of Things to Come captures that same sort of poetic and lyrical examination of the strange and enigmatic creature that America is, and has been. Though topically diverse, each of the essays in this collection link together to draw forth those prophetic voices in the country's past and recent history. It also happens to include the best writing on David Lynch's films I've come across. Highly recommended.

[gregtmills · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

At first blush, pop Zarathustra Greil Marcus's latest book, The Shape of Things to Come, looks like something cooked up by a Sarah Lawrence undergrad in an end-of-term panic. According to Marcus, America exists only as a cultural construct coalesced from the words of our national prophets—people like Martin Luther King, Philip Roth, David Lynch, John Dos Passos, Pere Ubu's Dave Thomas, and ... Bill Pullman(!). But while showing us how to unlock the mystery of America by loading up an Amazon shopping cart, Marcus manages a wild-eyed grandeur that out-argues any co-ed essay. Analyzing these prophets' works, from the conflicted professor of The Human Stain to the menacing, eyebrowless dwarf of Lost Highway, Marcus gains insight into the nature of these United States: America doesn't really exist, at least not as other nations exist. Rather, the country is a collection of vanguard ideas, weirdo prophetic narratives that come to life when you and your neighbors invest in them. The book is a rambling mess—but it's a beautiful and seductive one.