Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook610 pages8 hours
The Partnership: Five Cold Warriors and Their Quest to Ban the Bomb
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Offering a clear analysis of the danger of nuclear terrorism and how it can be prevented, The Partnership sheds light on one of the most divisive security issues facing Washington today. Award-winning New York Times journalist Philip Taubman illuminates our vulnerability in the face of this pressing terrorist threat—and the unlikely efforts of five key Cold War players to eliminate the nuclear arsenal they helped create. Bob Woodward calls The Partnership a “brilliant, penetrating study of nuclear threats, present and past,” and David Kennedy writes that it is “indispensable reading for all who would understand the desperate urgency of containing the menace of nuclear proliferation.”
Unavailable
Related to The Partnership
Related ebooks
The New Nuclear Danger: George W. Bush's Military-Industrial Complex Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Seventh Decade: The New Shape of Nuclear Danger Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Implications of the Reykjavik Summit on Its Twentieth Anniversary: Conference Report Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow the Gloves Came Off: Lawyers, Policy Makers, and Norms in the Debate on Torture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The State of the American Mind: Stupor and Pathetic Docility Volume Ii: Stupor and Pathetic Docility Volume Ii Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeception: The Making of the YouTube Video Hillary and Obama Blamed for Benghazi Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of David Enrich's Servants of the Damned Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Iranian Constitutional Revolution and the Clerical Leadership of Khurasani Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHearts and Minds: A People's History of Counterinsurgency Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mantle of Command: FDR at War, 1941–1942 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDanger and Opportunity: An American Ambassador's Journey Through the Middle East Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStopping the Bomb: The Sources and Effectiveness of US Nonproliferation Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTonkin Gulf and the Escalation of the Vietnam War, Revised Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Servants of the Damned By David Enrich: Giant Law Firms, Donald Trump, and the Corruption of Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFoundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the Rise of American Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsContainment and Credibility: The Ideology and Deception That Plunged America into the Vietnam War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Ascendancy: How the United States Gained and Wielded Global Dominance Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5American Force: Dangers, Delusions, and Dilemmas in National Security Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEisenhower's Warning: For The Sake Of Humanity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEyes on the Horizon: Serving on the Front Lines of National Security Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Table of Truth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ashwander Rules: A Novel of the Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivergent Memories: Opinion Leaders and the Asia-Pacific War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivided by Terror: American Patriotism after 9/11 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hope and History: A Memoir of Tumultuous Times Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegime Change: National Security in the Age of Terrorism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExporting the Bomb: Technology Transfer and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Torture Memos: Rationalizing the Unthinkable Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Political Biographies For You
Mein Kampf Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Indifferent Stars Above: The Harrowing Saga of the Donner Party Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Benjamin Franklin: An American Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Assassination Vacation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Malcolm X: A Graphic Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Manhunt: The 12-Day Chase for Lincoln's Killer: An Edgar Award Winner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Enough Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A World Without Jews Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Freezing Order: A True Story of Money Laundering, Murder, and Surviving Vladimir Putin's Wrath Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Community: Seven Principles for Belonging Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lincoln's Melancholy: How Depression Challenged a President and Fueled His Greatness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Putin's People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took On the West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Watergate: A New History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The First Conspiracy: The Secret Plot to Kill George Washington Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story of the Trapp Family Singers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Profiles in Courage: Deluxe Modern Classic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lincoln's Last Trial: The Murder Case That Propelled Him to the Presidency Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unhinged: An Insider's Account of the Trump White House Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Five Presidents: My Extraordinary Journey with Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and Ford Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Partnership
Rating: 4.3125 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
8 ratings3 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nuclear strategy during the Cold War had on its face a kind of Alice in Wonderland logic. Having thousands of weapons, enough to eradicate entire civilizations, was safer than not having any. Eschewing promises to never launch the weapons on a first strike, despite no offensive intent to ever do so, blocked enemies from launching theirs -- a "launch on warning" posture made each side very cautious. The possibility that escalation to nuclear weapons might stem from conventional war kept the powers from risking war. Low-yield tactical nuclear weapons (so-called battlefield nukes) are more dangerous than the mega tonnage weapons because their limited destructive capacity make their use easier to contemplate. Huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons that could destroy entire populations are more cost-effective than maintaining large conventional forces. Anti-nuclear defensive weapons, i.e. the SDI "Star Wars" plan of the Reagan years, were actually destabilizing to the balance of terror since being protected from the others' nukes meant you could use your own with impunity. Perhaps the most illogical aspect of nuclear weapons systems is that, even though the consequences of their use is almost too great to horrible to contemplate, the weapons were controlled by hair trigger protocols -- decision makers had literally minutes to decide to launch and a single human or mechanical error could unleash Armageddon on the world.This is all quite scary, but one could fairly conclude that these strategies worked. Nuclear weapons were not once used after their first introduction against Japan. The 20th century saw two great wars in its first half with tens of millions of casualties. There were none in the century's second half, perhaps due to fear of escalation to nuclear weapon use. Indeed, the two great powers controlling nuclear arms, despite their bitter, hostile relationship, were, but for a few close calls, exceedingly cautious in keeping the lid on rising tensions.But, the Cold War is over. So, what should be the strategy governing nuclear weapons in the 21st century? If our nation once needed massive stocks of nuclear arms to check the aggression of hostile foes, who are these foes now? If deterrence once worked, what or who are we needing to deter now? If we need to retain nuclear weapons in our national armory for the possibility that they might be needed in the future, do we really need thousands of them? Are the instantaneous launch practices of the past worth the risk of accidental use? In this post Cold War world, there still remains significant institutional commitment -- military, policy think tanks, techno-industrial -- to the policies of the last 70 years. Isn't it time to think and act outside the Cold War strategy box? When the world conditions underpinning the logic of deterrence strategies no longer exist, it becomes pointless to continue those strategies. But, the task of disengaging is actually quite complex, in some respects made difficult by the changed conditions. Fortunately, the vital challenge to move beyond Cold War strategies has been taken on by five prominent leaders as told in The Partnership by Philip Taubman. Perhaps ironically these leaders are among the fathers of nuclear policies of the last seventy years, the authors of the doctrines they now feel misdirected: Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, Sam Nunn, and William Perry. Sidney Drell, a physicist and weapons expert, joined the four in this undertaking. These statesmen have not only seen the wisdom of de-escalating the place of nuclear weapons in the nations that possess them, but envision moving toward complete abolition. In 2008, after intense deliberation and collaboration, the five authored an Op-Ed column in the Wall Street Journal that called for radical reorientation of nuclear policy, including ultimately, steps to ultimately abolish nuclear arms altogether. Their lofty reputations and international standing lends enormous credibility to their recommendations.In the first decades of the 21st century the challenges of nuclear weapons and nuclear materials are vastly more complicated than the issues of the past. The first challenge is the sheer size of nuclear arsenals. Between the Soviet Union and the United States there was at its zenith over 70,000 nuclear warheads. The work in the 1990's and early 2000's to remove weapons from former Soviet republics is rightly hailed as a major accomplishment, as was the reduction of delivery systems. Notwithstanding these successes, the size of the arsenals can only continue the risk of mishap -- the greater the quantity the greater the risk. (And, isn't the risk still greater as our concentration on nuclear weapons wanes?) While reductions were made following the dissolution of the Soviet Union the downsizing initiative seems to have stalled. The second problem haunting the nuclear stage is the proliferation of weapons among various states across the globe: India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea and, possibly soon, Iran. Successes were gained in persuading some countries tinkering with acquiring nuclear arms (South Africa, Libya and Brazil) to drop their development, but the presence of these weapons in the remaining states - several of which are unstable or with ideological axes to grind. Undoubtedly, it will be a heavy lift to stop further proliferation and entice these states to give up their nuclear arms. The proliferation problem is made more problematic because the technical ability to create nuclear weapons is no longer exclusive to the super powers.Perhaps of greatest concern is the porous control over existing fissile materials. It is certain that terrorist groups would salivate at the prospect of obtaining highly-enriched uranium. While these substances could be used in bomb-making, a much lower tech possibility are so-called "dirty bombs" that whose detonation, while not capable of nuclear fission, would spread deadly radioactive toxins across wide areas. A dirty bomb set off in a major metropolitan center would result in many thousands of casualties. Unlike the nukes of old, these bombs don't need sophisticated delivery systems; they could be carried in a trunk. Moreover, the retaliatory check on the Cold War nuclear powers is meaningless to terrorists; there is nothing we could do in retaliation that would deter them. High-yield uranium stocks exist in significant quantities in many locales around the globe. Investigations have shown that these materials are poorly accounted for and stored in unsecure settings. An effort to retrieve this fissile material has been partially successful, but the lack of precise accounting hampers this initiative.The partners have proposed bold but practical steps to reverse these disturbing situations. They have gotten endorsement from many world leaders and from the General Assembly of the UN. President Obama has shown genuine interest in advancing these goals. Along with a steady reduction of arms inventories and continued efforts at non-proliferation, the retrieval and control of high-yield uranium is a vital priority. Dissuading or preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons is critical; a nuclear Iran would incredibly dangerous to the region and to the world. Pakistan is worrisome due to the instability of the government and its covert links to terrorist groups. North Korea has such a bizarre world view that its possession of weapons can only be viewed with the gravest concern.The partners are hard-headed realists who know that achieving the goal of a nuclear-free world is a hard slog. One is aware that these leaders are in their last few years -- Schultz and Kissinger are past 90. It seems that to sustain their efforts and continue on toward the goals, all of us must keep this a high priority.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everyone should read this book.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A very detailed political history of nuclear war, policy and the small group of influential men who came together to bring nuclear proliferation to the world stage. The author pulls from many interviews, personal writings, and oral histories to give the reader a complete picture of how the very men who established the policies of mutually assured destruction decided to devote their careers to reducing the international nuclear arsenals to zero.The author gives you the personal histories of the men, how they met and formed their unlikely partnership to abolish nuclear weaponry. Although it took a long time to gain momentum, this movement is beginning to pick up a diverse group of supporters from around the world. It's a disturbing history, but one that offers a glimmer of hope for the future.