Little America: The War Within the War for Afghanistan
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
The author of the acclaimed bestseller and National Book Award finalist, Imperial Life in the Emerald City, tells the startling, behind-the-scenes story of the US’s political and military misadventure in Afghanistan. In this meticulously reported and illuminating book, Rajiv Chandrasekaran focuses on southern Afghanistan in the year of President Obama’s surge, and reveals the epic tug of war that occurred between the president and a military that increasingly went its own way. The profound ramifications this political battle had on the region and the world are laid bare through a cast of fascinating characters—disillusioned and inept diplomats, frustrated soldiers, headstrong officers—who played a part in the process of pumping American money and soldiers into Afghan nation-building. What emerges in Little America is a detailed picture of unsavory compromise—warlords who were to be marginalized suddenly embraced, the Karzai family transformed from foe to friend, fighting corruption no longer a top priority—and a venture that became politically, financially, and strategically unsustainable.
Also:
A Washington Post Notable Book
A St. Louis Post-Dispatch Best Book of the Year
Rajiv Chandrasekaran
Rajiv Chandrasekaran is an assisting managing editor of the Washington Post, where he has worked since 1994. He previously served the Post as a bureau chief in Baghdad, Cairo and Southeast Asia, and as a correspondent covering the war in Afghanistan. He recently completed a term as journalist-in-residence at the International Reporting Project at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies, and was a public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center. He lives in Washington, D.C.
Related to Little America
Related ebooks
Flashman and Madison's War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrenching At Gallipoli Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Benedict Arnold: Battlefield Hero or Selfish Traitor? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreen in Judgement Cold in Blood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRedcoat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChicken Street: Afghanistan before the Taliban: Clearing the Deadly Remnants of War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne Damned Island After Another: The Saga of the Seventh Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCombat Engineer, Pacific Theater: Daily Life in an Army Construction Battalion in World War Ii Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Doug Stanton's Horse Soldiers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPal's & Neighbours: As Britain Stood Alone Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStrange Stories from History for Young People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Jungle Road to Tokyo Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDuffy's Regiment: A History of the Hastings and Prince Edward Regiment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCentury's Child: A Novel of an American Family's Cold War Years Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAVG Confidential: A Flying Tiger Reports to the U.S. Navy, April 1942 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGeneral Jackson (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLame Bird's Legacy: Nez Perce Collection, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPike & Cutlass Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Quest to Get Home Bound: The Story of One Man's Battle to Return Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLIFE Heroes of World War II: Men and Women Who Put Their Lives on the Line Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Days of Poor Richard Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Sean Naylor's Not a Good Day to Die Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgent Garbo: The Brilliant, Eccentric Secret Agent Who Tricked Hitler and Saved D-Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Strange Stories of Colonial Days Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Alexander Rose's Washington's Spies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAngels Against the Sun: A WWII Saga of Grunts, Grit, and Brotherhood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNavajo Code Talkers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Geopolitics For You
The Decisive Decade: American Grand Strategy for Triumph Over China Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMossad: The Greatest Missions of the Israeli Secret Service Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Culture, Art and Literature: Sison Reader Series, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Really Happened In Wuhan: A Virus Like No Other, Countless Infections, Millions of Deaths Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Q Chronicles, #2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Chief Witness: escape from China’s modern-day concentration camps Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inside the Middle East: Entering a New Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn the Communist Party of the Philippines 1968 - 1999: Sison Reader Series, #5 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChina Unbound: A New World Disorder Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America's Progressive Elite Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Case Against Hillary Clinton Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Inside the Middle East: Making Sense of the Most Dangerous and Complicated Region on Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Secret Gate: a true story of courage and sacrifice during the collapse of Afghanistan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doing Time Like A Spy: How the CIA Taught Me to Survive and Thrive in Prison Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Power of Geography: Ten Maps That Reveal the Future of Our World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Destined for War: can America and China escape Thucydides’ Trap? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Snake Oil: How Xi Jinping Shut Down the World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5War in Ukraine: Making Sense of a Senseless Conflict Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Great U.S.-China Tech War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Except for Palestine: The Limits of Progressive Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Atlas of Countries That Don't Exist: A Compendium of Fifty Unrecognized and Largely Unnoticed States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rare Metals War: the dark side of clean energy and digital technologies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Policy of Deceit: Britain and Palestine, 1914-1939 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Decisions 2023 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar with Russia?: From Putin & Ukraine to Trump & Russiagate Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Illegitimate Authority: Facing the Challenges of Our Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Little America
28 ratings3 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Little America analyzes the efforts of US and allied forces to combat the Taliban and “nation build” in Afghanistan. “Little America” refers to a large-scale program carried out in the 1950’s and 1960’s by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) to reclaim unproductive land in southwest Afghanistan by an elaborate network of irrigation canals and electric power stations. An American village for the planners and engineers was constructed in the region called “Little America” by the inhabitants. Despite millions of dollars of investment the plan failed. The engineers failed to recognize that the salinity of the water used to irrigate would ultimately make growing crops nearly impossible. The area reverted to its dilapidated and hard scrabble state. Little American exemplifies American overreach and our persistent mistake of presuming that what works in American can – with American “know-how” – be transplanted anywhere. Fast forward 50 years and we find Americans trying yet again to bring prosperity to the region while fighting Taliban insurgents throughout the Helmand province. After the misguided adventure in Iraq subsided in 2008-09 the US switched its focus to Afghanistan. A counter insurgency strategy, successful in Iraq under General David Petraeus, was shifted to Afghanistan. Counter insurgency was aimed at winning the “hearts and minds” of Afghanis through the infusion of massive amount of funds for public works projects. A close corollary was to build the capacity of the national government so that the people would see the government as a desirable alternative to the Taliban. While fighting the Taliban was the key to securing a region the follow along efforts to bring benefits to the people was thought to be the means to secure and maintain the loyalty of the local population.Chandrasekaran spent several years on the ground in the country looking closely at all aspects of this initiative. He concludes that it largely has failed. He looked primarily in Helmand province, a hotbed of Taliban activity whose major city Kandahar was threatened by Taliban takeover. The so-called surge of troops implemented by President Obama early in his first term gave the fighting forces sufficient strength to push the Taliban back. The top military leaders felt that going into the rural areas was a waste of effort, that the most attention should be paid to Kandahar and surrounding environs. The Marine commanders felt otherwise driven by their bias toward offensive actions everywhere throughout the province. This meant that they were capturing control over areas that had little strategic or practical value given the alternative for use of combat resources.The civic works projects, intended to win over the population, largely failed. Communication, coordination and cooperation between the State Department (particularly the USAID) and the military was poor. Massive sums of money were made available with the expectation that projects would be quickly designed and rapidly implemented. It was clear that Obama intended to draw down US involvement in the country and that it must be “saved” in short order so that the US effort could be deemed a success. Adding greatly to the poor outcomes of this well-meaning effort was the utter corruption of the national government. By intending to build a strong and effective Afghanis government the US was forced to work closely with corrupt government officials which meant essentially that we were abetting criminality. While the final outcome is still not known it seems highly doubtful that in the long term a western style ethos of impartial competent governance will prevail.Some astute analysts counseled that a long and steady engagement with Afghanistan could ultimately achieve stability. Clearly, this approach is not acceptable to policy makers in the US and certainly not the general public as well. Should it not be plain after decades of foreign policy failures that American simply cannot tolerate the long pull? We seem to demand quick fixes that don’t create sacrifices or even inconveniences on our part.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Another great job of interpretive, analytical reporting bu Chandrasekaran. I wish my years in the U.S. Foreign Service did not reinforce the failures of accountability, cooperation, and strategic thought and action that he documents. Unfortunately, everything he writes rings true. More people outside the Beltway should read this book and then demand change based on its lessons.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As he did in his book on the Green Zone in Iraq, Chandrasekaran blisteringly reveals American arrogance, wastefulness, and infighting leading to incompetent planning and execution of the mission/s (because people disagreed about what the idea was) in Afghanistan. It’s hard to pick out the most awful part, but my candidate is the way that USAID repeatedly stopped projects to get Afghan farmers growing cotton—a cash crop that they really could have sold in-country in place of opium poppies—because Afghan cotton might someday, theoretically, compete with American cotton. Because that’s really much more important than cutting off the Taliban’s funding and providing Afghan farmers with a sustainable crop!