Audiobook7 hours
The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution
Written by Eric Foner
Narrated by Donald Corren
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
()
About this audiobook
An authoritative history by the preeminent scholar of the Civil War–era, The Second Founding traces the arc of the three foundational Reconstruction amendments from their origins in antebellum activism and adoption amidst intense postwar politics to their
virtual nullification by narrow Supreme Court decisions and Jim Crow state laws. Today these amendments remain strong tools for achieving the American ideal of equality, if only we will take them up.
“Gripping and essential.”—New York Times
virtual nullification by narrow Supreme Court decisions and Jim Crow state laws. Today these amendments remain strong tools for achieving the American ideal of equality, if only we will take them up.
“Gripping and essential.”—New York Times
Author
Eric Foner
Eric Foner is DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University and the author of several books. In 2006 he received the Presidential Award for Outstanding Teaching at Columbia University. He has served as president of the Organization of American Historians, the American Historical Association, and the Society of American Historians. He lives in New York City.
More audiobooks from Eric Foner
The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Forever Free: The Story of Emancipation and Reconstruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to The Second Founding
Related audiobooks
Reconstruction: A Concise History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unruly Americans and the Origins of the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How the South Won the Civil War: Oligarchy, Democracy, and the Continuing Fight for the Soul of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Power and Liberty: Constitutionalism in the American Revolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Here to Equality: Reparations for Black Americans in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5These Truths: A History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom National: The destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861-1865 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Broken Constitution: Lincoln, Slavery, and the Refounding of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln's Legacy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Confederate and Neo-Confederate Reader: The "Great Truth" about the "Lost Cause" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crooked Path to Abolition: Abraham Lincoln and the Antislavery Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Force and Freedom: Black Abolitionists and the Politics of Violence Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Second Amendment: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Property in Man: Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation's Founding Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Realigners: Partisan Hacks, Political Visionaries, and the Struggle to Rule American Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Until Justice Be Done: America's First Civil Rights Movement from the Revolution to Reconstruction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Fierce Urgency of Now: Lyndon Johnson, Congress, and the Battle for the Great Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5To Make Men Free: A History of the Republican Party Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Politicians and the Egalitarians: The Hidden History of American Politics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Justice Deferred: Race and the Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJames Madison and the Struggle for the Bill of Rights Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Founding Rivals: Madison vs. Monroe, the Bill of Rights, and the Election That Saved a Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liberty is Sweet: The Hidden History of the American Revolution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5American Republics: A Continental History of the United States 1783-1850 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Radicalism of the American Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Impending Crisis: America Before the Civil War: 1848-1861 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
United States History For You
The Fourth Turning Is Here: What the Seasons of History Tell Us about How and When This Crisis Will End Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the Guys Who Killed the Guy Who Killed Lincoln: A Nutty Story About Edwin Booth and Boston Corbett Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Land of Delusion: Out on the edge with the crackpots and conspiracy-mongers remaking our shared reality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the Witches: The Horror of Salem, Massachusetts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51776 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: 2nd Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of September 11, 2001 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Master Slave Husband Wife: An Epic Journey from Slavery to Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Charlie Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Untold History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dragonfire: Four Days That (Almost) Changed America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Astor: The Rise and Fall of an American Fortune Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Valiant Women: The Extraordinary American Servicewomen Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Waco: David Koresh, the Branch Davidians, and A Legacy of Rage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Vanderbilt: The Rise and Fall of an American Dynasty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5South to America: A Journey Below the Mason-Dixon to Understand the Soul of a Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5John Adams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5UFO: The Inside Story of the US Government's Search for Alien Life Here—and Out There Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Indifferent Stars Above: The Harrowing Saga of the Donner Party Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Road to Jonestown: Jim Jones and Peoples Temple Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ghosts of Honolulu: A Japanese Spy, A Japanese American Spy Hunter, and the Untold Story of Pearl Harbor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Second Founding
Rating: 4.374999821428572 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
56 ratings6 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A must read to understand the suppression of our right to vote, the legacy of slavery and the interference by and legislation the Supreme Court has helped create in so many of its flawed, political and racist based decisions.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5It's just so g*****n bleak. We've done this before, and given in at the finish line. We are one more federal election way from a minority party nullifying election results they don't like. The terrible thing is that would mean the cynics were right all along.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/55708. The Second Founding How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution, by Eric Foner (read 25 Sep 2020) This little book is the fourth book by Foner I have read. It tells the interesting story as to how the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution came to be added. He also relates how the Supreme Court has handled those amendments--in this the 14th has been most interpreted, in many cases involving issues unrelated to why it was adopted. He shows that the Supreme Court weakened the amendment in the 19th century and that weakening has not been set aside by the Court, so that students of constitutional law have a lot more trouble understanding that amendment than one would expect..Relatively few cases involving the 13th and 15th amendments have occurred whereas the 14rh has given rise to much litigation indeed, much unrelated to what it ostensibly was enacted to cure.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pulitzer Prize winner Eric Foner is recognized as America’s leading expert on the history of the period immediately after the U.S. Civil War, known as Reconstruction, during which the North tried to build an egalitarian society. The title of his latest book, The Second Founding, encapsulates his thesis that the changes to American society effected during Reconstruction were so profound they amounted to a new beginning - indeed, a second founding - of the nation.The principal purpose of the original ten amendments to the Constitution, the Bill Of Rights, was to protect individuals from the power of the new central government. Though the original authors of these documents (often hallowed as “the Founders”) wanted a national government more formidable than the one established by the feckless Articles of Confederation, they sought to limit the power it could exercise over its citizens. But those constraints did not apply to individual states. For example, many of the states continued to have established religions even though the first Amendment forbade the national government from establishing any single religion. Foner argues convincingly that the Civil War was fought over the southern states’ efforts to preserve the institution of slavery. [Although the declarations of secession by Southern states clearly articulated that the protection of slavery was the paramount impetus for the rupture per, for example, Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens, enough later Southern history revisionists averred that secession was actually about "states' rights" that the argument has to be constantly relitigated.] But even though the North had won the war, there was no immediate legal basis for eliminating slavery or for protecting the newly freed slaves from the depredations or their former masters. Ironically, the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 had “freed” only those slaves still under the control of the rebel armies, leaving slaves in the northern and border states in a legal no-man’s-land concerning servitude. The legal scaffolding for reorganizing the country took the form of three transformative amendments to the Constitution: the 13th, 14th, and 15th. The 13th abolished slavery throughout the country. The 14th established birthright citizenship for any person born in the United States “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” along with requiring the states to provide “due process” and “equal protection” to all “persons within their jurisdiction.” The 15th prohibited the states from denying the right to vote to any person on the basis of “race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” The effect of these amendments and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 was to attempt to put into practice the ideal of equality expressed in the Declaration of Independence. To that end, the amendments invested substantially more power in the national government and provided the means to make the national government the protector of individuals against discrimination and unfair treatment by states or local governments.This indeed was revolutionary.Discussion: Foner is not only superb historian, he is an excellent legal analyst. As an historian, his description of the political maneuvering behind the adoption of the amendments is riveting. But what really stands out in his narration is his explication of the legal niceties behind the language adopted. [Well, maybe that’s just the lawyer in me enjoying some good legal writing.]Unfortunately, the story of the second founding does not end with the adoption of praiseworthy amendments. As Foner recounts, the language of the amendments left enough wiggle room for malevolent racists in the postwar South to reestablish white race-based hegemony. With the end of U.S. Grant’s presidency in 1877 (Grant was dedicated to ensuring that freed blacks realized their newly legislated rights), national commitment to helping and protecting blacks ended in large part as well. Northern troops were withdrawn from the South. “Jim Crow” laws taking rights away from blacks were enacted in one state of the South after another. The Klan was given free rein to exercise police power over blacks without fear of reprisal. Schools and other public services for blacks were defunded. History textbooks used in southern schools were designed to teach white superiority and black backwardness, so that children imbibed these ideas from the earliest age. These practices persisted until the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, but did not end entirely. Rather, they took on new shapes; the battle for racial justice continues to this day.Foner recapitulates the sorry history of how a complicit United States Supreme Court abetted racist politicians and lower court judges in their efforts to eviscerate the original intent of Civil War Amendments for almost 100 years after their enactment. Again, his legal skills come to the fore as he takes us through the intricacies of numerous cases that constitute the corpus of civil rights jurisprudence. Evaluation: This book is surprisingly brief (only 176 pages) considering the depth with which it treats a complex subject. It’s principal thesis, that the Civil War and Reconstruction completely overhauled the Constitution and the society it governed, is ably and cogently argued. I very highly recommend it as required history for all American citizens. (JAB)
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5In this short book, Dr. Foner goes through the background to the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, using contemporary sources, to make the case that those three amendments did not simply abolish slavery but established broad principals that should have governed the expansion of civil rights for African-Americans but that were limited by later Supreme Court decisions that shied away from the clear intentions of the Amendments and permitted the exclusion of black voters, the Jim Crow laws, and the use of violence to keep African-Americans from exercising their rights. The parallels with our recent and ongoing Supreme Court decisions are obvious.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Short book. “Members of Congress during the Civil War and Reconstruction had the irritating habit of not debating at length, or at all, concerns that have driven recent jurisprudence relating to the amendments.” The Supreme Court screwed up the amendments early on by limiting them to favor whites (and expanding them to favor corporations), and we haven’t yet fixed that. As he points out, by the 1890s, when the Reconstruction amendments started to get their still-fixed interpretations, “the Court’s members included Edward D. White, a former Confederate soldier with a deep abhorrence of Reconstruction who as a young man had participated in efforts by a white paramilitary organization to overthrow Louisiana’s biracial government,” and who became Chief Justice in 1910. The Court struck down laws that tried to protect voting rights generally and to protect citizens against private racist violence. At every point, even though the history is contested and there were always different views of the meaning of the amendments, the Court has taken the narrow view.Foner also covers how black voices have been ignored in discerning the framers’ intent, even though black votes were key to passing the Fourteenth Amendment, and how Chinese exclusion was “promoted, in part, as a fulfillment of the Thirteenth Amendment” by keeping out people allegedly too servile to be citizens. And the amendments themselves were a hodgepodge of compromise; a few far-sighted commentators noted that the exemption for prisoners in the Thirteenth Amendment could do great damage, and now it has. Also, did you know that the Fourteenth Amendment provides for reduction of representation if states disenfranchised significant numbers of male voters, but that was never implemented? And the Fifteenth Amendment could have guaranteed a right to vote, precluding most of the tactics now being deployed against mostly minority voters, but it didn’t, in part because many white Westerners wanted to exclude Asians and some Northeastern states imposed literacy or property tests on immigrants. As for Southern tactics to suppress voting, “Republican leaders also did not expect that the South’s political leaders would not mind—or might even welcome—the fact that significant numbers of poorer whites would lose the right to vote because of such laws.”