Audiobook4 hours
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up
Written by John Allen Paulos
Narrated by Dick Hill
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
3/5
()
About this audiobook
A lifelong unbeliever finds no reason to change his mind.
Are there any logical reasons to believe in God? Mathematician and bestselling author John Allen Paulos thinks not. In Irreligion he presents the case for his own worldview, organizing his book into twelve chapters that refute the twelve arguments most often put forward for believing in God's existence. The latter arguments, Paulos relates in his characteristically lighthearted style, "range from what might be called golden oldies to those with a more contemporary beat. On the playlist are the first-cause argument, the argument from design, the ontological argument, arguments from faith and biblical codes, the argument from the anthropic principle, the moral universality argument, and others." Interspersed among his twelve counterarguments are remarks on a variety of irreligious themes, ranging from the nature of miracles and creationist probability to cognitive illusions and prudential wagers. Special attention is paid to topics, arguments, and questions that spring from his incredulity "not only about religion but also about others' credulity."
Are there any logical reasons to believe in God? Mathematician and bestselling author John Allen Paulos thinks not. In Irreligion he presents the case for his own worldview, organizing his book into twelve chapters that refute the twelve arguments most often put forward for believing in God's existence. The latter arguments, Paulos relates in his characteristically lighthearted style, "range from what might be called golden oldies to those with a more contemporary beat. On the playlist are the first-cause argument, the argument from design, the ontological argument, arguments from faith and biblical codes, the argument from the anthropic principle, the moral universality argument, and others." Interspersed among his twelve counterarguments are remarks on a variety of irreligious themes, ranging from the nature of miracles and creationist probability to cognitive illusions and prudential wagers. Special attention is paid to topics, arguments, and questions that spring from his incredulity "not only about religion but also about others' credulity."
Author
John Allen Paulos
John Allen Paulos is a professor of mathematics at Temple University. His books include the bestseller Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences (H&W, 1988), Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market, and A Mathematician Reads the Newspapers.
Related to Irreligion
Related audiobooks
Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What's New with Atheism?: The Thoughtful Person’s Guide to Understanding Non-Belief Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/550 Great Myths About Atheism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5My Path to Atheism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mere Morality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hi, I'm an Atheist!: What That Means and How to Talk About It with Others Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Evolution of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inside the Atheist Mind: Unmasking the Religion of Those Who Say There Is No God Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Divinity of Doubt: The God Question Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The End of Faith Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Talking God: Philosophers on Belief Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Why We Need Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Does God Exist? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Meaning to Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Patience with God: Faith for People Who Don't Like Religion (or Atheism) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Future of God: The Merging of Science and Religion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rage Against God: How Atheism Led Me to Faith Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Free Will Explained: How Science and Philosophy Converge to Create a Beautiful Illusion Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Seven Types of Atheism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5What is Religion Really?: Surprising Answers from Leading Thinkers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat It Means to Be Moral: Why Religion Is Not Necessary for Living an Ethical Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Godless Citizens in a Godly Republic: Atheists in American Public Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Case Against Miracles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All That's Wrong with the Bible: Contradictions, Absurdities, and More Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Religion and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Nonbeliever Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5And Yet...: Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Comparative Religion For You
Person of Interest: Why Jesus Still Matters in a World that Rejects the Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus: Third Edition with Bonus Content, New Reflections Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The God Delusion Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Perennial Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Witches of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No God but One: Allah or Jesus?: A Former Muslim Investigates the Evidence for Islam and Christianity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Passport to Heaven: The True Story of a Zealous Mormon Missionary Who Discovers the Jesus He Never Knew Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Holy Envy: Finding God in the Faith of Others Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Spirituality of Imperfection: Storytelling and the Search for Meaning Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Living Wicca: A Further Guide for the Solitary Practitioner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5World Religion 101: From Buddhism to Judaism, History, Beliefs, and Practices of the Great Religions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Journeys to Heaven and Hell: Tours of the Afterlife in the Early Christian Tradition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Answering Jihad: A Better Way Forward Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Varieties of Religious Experience Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Neighboring Faiths: A Christian Introduction to World Religions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBuckland's Complete Book of Witchcraft Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Universe Next Door: A Basic Worldview Catalogue Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Abraham: A Journey to the Heart of Three Faiths Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Misunderstood Jew: The Church and the Scandal of the Jewish Jesus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mormon Mirage: A Former Member Looks at the Mormon Church Today Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Wisdom from the World's Religions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Without Buddha I Could Not Be a Christian Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wicca for One: The Path of Solitary Witchcraft Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5To Ride a Silver Broomstick: New Generation Witchcraft Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for Irreligion
Rating: 3.230769230769231 out of 5 stars
3/5
13 ratings8 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This won't convince anyone not already convinced, but Paulos does apply a mathematical edge to the analysis.
The most telling chapter was the last - Athiests, Agnostics, and "Brights". I agree with Paulos in that I am also not too fond of the name "Brights", but maybe it'll catch on. The statistics are disturbing in how others view atheists and non-believers. The stigma is still hard to overcome.1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5John Allen Paulos has written a breezy, but cogent, debunking of most of the "logical" arguments for the existence of God. Most of Paulos's arguments come down to Occam's razor. Positing the existence of God is not necessary to explain any of the phenomena discussed and is usually just an extraneous step in the ostensible argument. Some of the arguments for God's existence are merely logical ledgermain [sorry Anselm] that don't have God as a valid conclusion.This book, like the recent efforts of Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and Richard Dawkins, is important in our absurdly pious and largely hypocritical political campaign. He seems to be saying to Americans, "Hasn't anyone here heard of the Enlightenment?" He quotes one of Voltaire's most telling epigrams: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." His final chapter is an exhortation to other infidels to make themselves heard since there are plenty of them, even though they are members of one of the least trusted categories of people in American society.(JAB)
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Sounds like it should be better than it is. The arguments are sound, but somehow it just isn't compelling reading.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Sounds like it should be better than it is. The arguments are sound, but somehow it just isn't compelling reading.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5It's me, over here in the choir robes. Nothing in this book I didn't already embrace, I mean. The geeky mathematical angle was a huge bonus. I found this audio book fun, funny and comforting. If you like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing you like. And I do.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Paulos makes some points I have not read elsewhere. And it was worth reading for those. But such points are few. The book is a bit light and I feel that others (such as Dawkins and Hitchens) have done a more thorough job addressing this subject.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Surprisingly thin. Paulos' earlier works are meaty, slim volumes on innumeracy. This one covers the territory but rambles; enjoyable if taken as the notes from an interesting dinner conversation with a smart guy, but isn't structured well enough for the lay reader. And the omission of Popperian falsifiability is astonishing.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Meh.Using mathematical logical to argue against the belief in God(s). Treading old ground with a more rigorously logical approach. Could have been far better if it went further, but for the arguments presented, it does a good job.