Racecar Engineering

Lost cause?

Having been in this business for nearly three decades now, one of the things that amuses and frustrates me in equal measure is the dysfunctional relationship motorsport has with technology. This is put into even sharper relief given how racing promotes itself to the outside world as a technology-based sport.

And nowhere is this more acute than with motor racing’s relationship with data acquisition, which I liken to the classic Jekyll and Hyde paradigm, but on acid.

As we’ll explore in this article, good data acquisition should be motorsport’s best friend.

Make no mistake, the two most significant technical innovations of motor racing in the later part of the 20th century have been aerodynamic downforce and data acquisition. Both have transformed the sport.

The former needs no introduction, but the latter has been just as key. It

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Racecar Engineering

Racecar Engineering7 min read
Spreading Disease
One of the great paradoxes of motor racing is for something that professes to be a technical sport, it has the most Jekyll and Hyde relationship with technology of any area of engineering I have encountered. A few classic examples are Balance of Perf
Racecar Engineering4 min read
To Be Or Not To Be?
The recommendation by the FIA to drop hybrids from the World Rally Championship in the middle of a rule cycle is a strange one but, at the same time, long term one that can be understood. On the face of it, the teams have been busy managing the techn
Racecar Engineering6 min read
Law Of Averages
The ongoing saga of Balance of Performance (BoP) took some dramatic steps in the early part of 2024. The FIA and ACO presented their new method of balancing the Hypercars to the media at the opening round of the FIA World Endurance Championship in Qa

Related