Post Magazine

US and UK politicians' 'unfounded and fact-twisting' claims about national security law dismissed by Hong Kong government

The Hong Kong government has hit out at United States senators and British members of parliament who took aim at the national security law in the run-up to the 26th anniversary of the city's return to Chinese rule.

A government spokesman on Friday accused American and British politicians of making "unfounded and fact-twisting remarks" about the Beijing-imposed legislation, which came into force on June 30, 2020 in the wake of the 2019 social unrest.

"The US and UK politicians wantonly put politics above the rule of law. Their attempts by despicable political manoeuvres to interfere in Hong Kong's law-based governance, and undermine the city's rule of law as well as its prosperity and stability, will only expose their own weaknesses and faulty arguments and be doomed to fail," he said.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

The spokesman said the Western politicians had ignored the impact of the social unrest, which had caused "severe damage to Hong Kong's society, economy and business environment".

He emphasised that any legal proceedings in connection with the national security law were taken based on evidence and had nothing to do with the political stance, background or occupation of those arrested.

"The city's judicial system has always been highly regarded by international communities," he added.

About 30 US senators on Thursday issued a joint statement to condemn human rights abuses said to be related to the national security law.

"The Chinese Communist Party and its acolytes in the Hong Kong government continue their campaign of repression in a once vibrant and international city," the statement said.

"They have arrested pro-democracy activists, prosecuted hundreds of political prisoners, obliterated a legislature chosen by the Hong Kong people and pressured Hong Kong's judicial system to align with Beijing's political prerogatives."

The British House of Commons on Wednesday also held a debate to mark the third anniversary of the legislation.

Conservative MP Iain Duncan Smith, a former leader of his party, said "prolonged detention without trial continues to raise serious questions about the existence of the rule of law".

But Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu the same day defended the national security law.

He said there had been "a lot of badmouthing" about the legislation and dismissed suggestions that people could commit a crime unwittingly under the law.

Lee emphasised that prosecution under national security legislation required proof of criminal intent.

The national security law was imposed by Beijing to crack down on secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign organisations.

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

Copyright (c) 2023. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

More from Post Magazine

Post Magazine3 min readWorld
EU Chief Ursula Von Der Leyen Invited To Xi Jinping-Emmanuel Macron Summit In Paris Next Week
French President Emmanuel Macron has invited Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission chief, to a trilateral meeting with visiting Chinese leader Xi Jinping next week. Brussels-based von der Leyen is considered one of Europe's most hawkish leade
Post Magazine4 min readWorld
US Overtakes Mainland China As Taiwan's Main Export Market, Sign Of 'Strategic Shift' Amid Tech Decoupling
The United States has surpassed mainland China as world hi-tech hub Taiwan's top export destination this year in a sign that supply chain decoupling has made a palpable shift toward Western-allied markets. Taiwan's US$26.625 billion worth of exports
Post Magazine3 min readInternational Relations
US Strategy For Indo-Pacific Region Must Promote Economic Development, Not Just Defence: Senate Panel
Washington's strategy for the Indo-Pacific region is heavily focused on defence and lacks a robust economic agenda promoting regional development, an influential US Senate panel heard on Wednesday. The US should present "alternatives to what our comp

Related