Calls for UN Security Council reform unlikely due to political gridlock during General Assembly
On the balance, it's something to be celebrated: after three years of the Covid-19 pandemic, the United Nations General Assembly is once again being held entirely in-person.
The New York Times reported that drivers are avoiding Midtown Manhattan so they don't get caught up in the infamous United Nations gridlock - which will last until Monday.
For the rest of us watching from afar, we'll be trying hard not to devote too much time contemplating the all-too-familiar banalities that accompany the General Assembly.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
Among these are calls for countries to move quickly to reform the Security Council, the UN's 15-nation elite grouping that makes decisions on sanctions, war and peace.
The United States, China, Britain, France and Russia - deemed victors of World War II - are permanent veto-wielding members, while 10 other nations rotate for two-year terms.
Japan, whose leader Fumio Kishida made UN reform a key tenet of his speech to the world body this week, is among a handful of middle powers seeking a permanent presence on the council.
Some observers have suggested calls for Security Council reform will benefit from new blood this year given Western frustrations over Russia's veto power: Moscow in effect blocked the council from holding it to account over its Ukraine invasion.
For the West's critics, such hopes are as good an example of its hypocrisy - and self-delusion - as there can be. After all, the US proceeded with its invasion of Iraq in 2003 after deliberately sidelining the Security Council.
Nonetheless, it looks like Washington is indeed stepping up its lip service on expanding the council. In his speech on Wednesday, US President Joe Biden said Washington backs increasing the number of permanent and non-permanent seats to make the UN "more inclusive, so we can better respond to the needs of today's world".
Richard Gowan, an expert on the UN at the International Crisis Group, suggested in recent remarks to Agence France-Presse that the "Americans don't really have an end game" to efforts for reform. "They're putting this out there to test the waters, to challenge the Chinese and the Russians. It could fizzle out."
Well there. Like New York drivers, come General Assembly time it's best to ignore gridlock - the political kind in this case - and make a big mental detour over discussions about the "urgent need" for UN reform.
This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).
Copyright (c) 2022. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
