This Week in Asia

China-Australia relations: plunging wine exports don't 'spell doom and gloom', but new markets crucial

Only 60 per cent of Australia's lost wine exports to China will be redirected to existing markets by 2025 unless Australia expends more effort into finding new markets, new research has shown.

And the potential losses by then could be in the billions.

Australian exporters will need to brace for the end of the bottled-wine trade with China as further modelling from Australia's agricultural research arm, the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (Abares) indicates China's new anti-dumping duties will "cause China's imports of bottled wine from Australia to cease entirely".

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

The protectionist duties of between 116.2 per cent and 218.4 per cent, which were formalised in March, make Australian wines more expensive to Chinese buyers.

"We expect that only 60 per cent of wine destined for China will find a place in our other existing markets by 2025, unless we make the effort to find alternative markets or do things differently," Abares executive director Jared Greenville said.

"While Australia exports wine to over 100 countries, the Chinese market was the largest in both export and volume for bottled wine, accounting for 40 per cent of export value share and 24 per cent of export volume share."

Bottled wine also accounted for more than 90 per cent of the value of Australia's exports to China, as Australian wine has traditionally commanded a premium value in China.

Before the duties were preliminarily imposed in November alongside an unofficial Chinese ban on Australian wine, which led to delays and detentions of wine exports at Chinese ports, Australian bottled wines were among the most expensive in China at A$11.59 (US$8.54) a litre, while French wine averaged A$7.43 a litre, according to Abares.

The wine duties and the unofficial ban stemmed from escalating tensions that started in April 2020, when Australia pushed for an independent investigation into the origin of the coronavirus without consulting Beijing beforehand.

Other trade goods also fell victim to the conflict, with China enacting unofficial bans on products such as log timber, barley, lobsters and coal.

"This isn't to spell doom and gloom; it's an outcome that can be avoided if we look at finding other markets for Australian wine or find ways to generate more value from our wine sold into existing markets," Greenville said. "The Australian wine industry is resilient, and industry bodies and businesses have already had success in diverting to other markets."

But it is a race against time for Australian exporters, as the total export value of Australian wine will be A$480 million (US$353.5 million) less by 2025 if new markets are not established to fully absorb the lost sales to China, Abares said. The total cost of China's anti-dumping measures to Australia could rack up to A$2.4 billion (US$1.77 billion) over a five-year period.

Last week, government industry group Wine Australia's full-year report card said Australia's total wine exports fell by 10 per cent to A$2.56 billion between July 2020 and last month - the full financial year. China's absence was the main driver.

China's imports, previously valued at about A$1 billion a year, fell to about A$600 million for the financial year.

Tony Battaglene, CEO of the leading Australian wine industry group Australian Grape & Wine, said many wineries across Australia that had previously focused solely on the Chinese market had come under "significant pressure" and were working hard to find new markets.

By March, the China-Australia conflict had resulted in a 40 per cent fall in most of Australia's exports to China, with the exception of iron ore, according to Australia's trade department.

Australia's iron ore supply to China actually rose in value and volume, due to China's post-pandemic economic recovery and surge in demand for steel used in infrastructure. Iron ore exports kept total trade with China relatively unaffected when compared with before the conflict started.

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

Copyright (c) 2021. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

More from This Week in Asia

This Week in Asia3 min read
South China Sea: Who Is Alberto Carlos, The Philippine Admiral Who Allegedly Agreed To 'New Model' In Second Thomas Shoal?
A vice-admiral in the Philippine navy is at the centre of a geopolitical scandal after the Chinese embassy in Manila claimed to have an audio recording of him agreeing to a controversial "new model" to manage conflict over a disputed shoal in the Sou
This Week in Asia4 min read
Philippine 4-day Work Week? Extreme Heat Reignites Talks On Flexible Deal
As the Philippines battles extreme heat from the El Nino weather pattern, a four-day work week practice in the civil service has revived a debate on whether the arrangement should be extended to other sectors in the country. The Philippine Department
This Week in Asia5 min read
Aukus Expansion: Japan, South Korea Want In On Pillar 2 - But Trust Is Still A Sticking Point
Aukus looks poised to expand, with a trio of US-aligned nations voicing their desire to join the regional security pact's technology sharing element in recent months. The three-way military partnership between Australia, Britain and the United States

Related