This Week in Asia

Communist Party's embrace risks hobbling China's private companies

More than 40 years ago, China began its transition to a market economy by opening up to the private sector and, since then, it has come a long way in terms of scale and influence.

The private sector now accounts for 50 per cent of the country's tax revenues, 60 per cent of gross domestic product and 90 per cent of enterprises.

Contrary to the propaganda, however, the ruling Communist Party has had an uneasy relationship with private businessmen, viewing them both as a necessary evil - for their massive contribution to the economy - and a potential threat.

Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China.

Thus, the private sector is largely treated as a second-class player, along with foreign investors, next to the state sector, in terms of market access and regulatory treatment.

The unspoken assumption is that the private sector is never "part of us".

This is set to change, according to state media, after the party released a detailed document this month on how it should "trust, unite, serve, guide and educate" the private sector.

For the first time, the party has listed "trust" as the top priority in its five-pronged approach to "unite the people from the private sector around the party and better promote development of the private economy", according to Xinhua.

The document, entitled Opinion on Strengthening the United Front Work of the Private Economy in the New Era, released on September 15, has also formally incorporated President Xi Jinping's directive that the private sector "is on our side".

Chinese President Xi Jinping. Photo: Xinhua alt=Chinese President Xi Jinping. Photo: Xinhua

This has heightened optimism that the private sector finally will be given the equal treatment it has been asking for over the past 40 years. Until now, private enterprises have faced greater administrative and regulatory barriers on entering strategic and lucrative sectors such as banking, health care, energy, infrastructure, television and broadcasting.

But there is also fear that there will be a trade-off; that the party aims to further control and regulate private businesses and entrepreneurs through the all-powerful United Front Work Department, as it has already done with state-owned enterprises.

Indeed, the party devotes much of the document to how it should "guide and educate" the private sector.

According to the document, people in the private sector should be guided and educated and infused with Xi Jinping Thought and keep their political stances closely aligned to those of the party leadership.

It calls for greater efforts to recruit more party members from the private sector and set up party committees at individual enterprises and strengthen ideological training of private sector individuals who are already party members at party schools of all levels.

The party plans to set up talent databases to identify and groom those businessmen who can form a backbone team "that is dependable and usable" in listening to the party at critical junctures.

As China's first generation of entrepreneurs are ageing and preparing to hand over the family reins, the party also plans to target the second-generation offspring by drawing up growth and promotion plans to make sure the younger generation will always listen to and follow the party.

The underlying message is clear: if you want to make money, you must swear allegiance to the party and follow its rules.

For those who think otherwise, a severe warning came on Tuesday when a court in Beijing sentenced Ren Zhiqiang, an outspoken critic of the party and Xi himself, to 18 years in prison on charges of corruption, taking bribes, misappropriating public funds, and abuse of power as a person working for a state-owned company.

Ren Zhiqiang. File photo alt=Ren Zhiqiang. File photo

The jailing of Ren has received much attention at home and abroad, not least because he was once considered a member of the country's elite.

A son of a senior government official, he headed a major state-owned real estate developer and was known for his political connections, once counting several Chinese leaders as friends.

He went missing in March after an essay he wrote critical of Xi circulated online. It goes without saying that Ren's punishment has sent shudders through not only the country's elites but also the business community.

Both the document and Ren's punishment are part of Xi's consistent and forceful steps to crack down on dissent and strengthen the party's control at all levels of society, encapsulated in a phase: "party, government, military, civilian, academic; east, west, south, north, and centre; the party leads them all".

But the party's enhanced controls also come at a time when the Chinese government needs to rely more on the private sector to create jobs and stimulate consumption even as China has become the first major world economy to stage a recovery from the coronavirus pandemic and faces an increasing confrontation with the United States over trade and technology.

In the two weeks since the document was released, the Chinese media has been full of reports that local officials are busy organising forums for private entrepreneurs or visiting their companies to discuss and push for the implementation of the document.

One should not be surprised if private entrepreneurs publicly show more enthusiasm in praising the party and being politically correct. Known for their resilience, they have become adept at coping with the frequent changes in the political winds from Beijing over the past 40 years.

Still, the party's latest attempt to blur the lines between the state sector and the private sector is not only counterproductive but also dangerous as it threatens to hobble independent-minded entrepreneurship, which contributes to the rapid development of the private sector.

Moreover, this will make it even harder for China's private companies to expand in Western countries where questions about their links with the party and its influence already complicate deals, as the TikTok saga has shown.

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

Copyright (c) 2020. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

More from This Week in Asia

This Week in Asia4 min read
Indonesia's Young Garuda Footballers Eye Olympic Glory As U-23 Asian Cup Run Ignites National Pride
Indonesia's national under-23 football team unleashed patriotic fervour across the sports-mad nation with a string of impressive performances in the U-23 Asian Cup, raising hopes for a shot at Olympic glory despite a recent heartbreaking defeat. The
This Week in Asia4 min read
Is Japan 'Xenophobic'? Biden's Remarks Spark Anger, Debate Over Cultural Differences
Comments made by US President Joe Biden in which he described Japan as "xenophobic" have caused an uproar among the Japanese, with some saying he was "wrong" to use the term, while others argued that accepting more foreigners might mean ending up lik
This Week in Asia4 min readWorld
Solomon Islands 'Locks In' China Ties With Another Pro-Beijing Leader As Bilateral Security Pact Still Rankles
The Solomon Islands has "locked in" ties with China after lawmakers chose another pro-Beijing prime minister, even though its government is expected to face greater scrutiny and demand for transparency in its engagement with Chinese officials, analys

Related Books & Audiobooks