Stereophile

BOULDER 2108 PHONO PREAMPLIFIER

In his review of this very expensive, very heavy, American-made, two-box phono preamplifier in the August issue,1 Michael Fremer enthused over its sound. “The 2108 produces both a sense of soaring exultation in the upper registers and gritty drama in the lowest one,” he wrote, adding “Boulder detractors who think their products are too analytical, sounding dry and bleached, ought to give the 2108 a listen.” Intrigued, and remembering how well Boulder’s previous flagship phono preamp, the 2008, measured back in 2002,2 I suggested to Stereophile’s editor-in-chief, Jim Austin, that I measure the 2108 and write a follow-up review.

I measured the Boulder 2108). As the 2108 has balanced inputs, I floated the signal generator’s balanced output from ground. For logistical reasons, I measured with the preamplifier chassis sitting on top of the power supply chassis.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Stereophile

Stereophile2 min read
Associated Equipment
Digital sources dCS Vivaldi Apex DAC, Vivaldi Upsampler Plus, Vivaldi Master Clock, and Rossini Transport; EMM Labs DV2 Integrated DAC, Meitner MA3 Integrated DAC; Innuos Statement Next-Gen Music Server; Small Green Computer Sonore Deluxe opticalModu
Stereophile1 min read
Stereophile
EDITOR JIM AUSTIN JIM.AUSTIN@STEREOPHILE.COM TECHNICAL EDITOR JOHN ATKINSON MANAGING EDITOR MARK HENNINGER SENIOR CONTRIBUTING EDITORS HERB REICHERT, KALMAN RUBINSON, JASON VICTOR SERINUS WEB PRODUCER JON IVERSON COPY EDITOR LINDA FELACO FOUNDER J. G
Stereophile16 min read
Octave V 70 Class A
It may be strange to read what I’m about to say in the pages of Stereophile, but it’s the cold hard truth so here goes: Audio reviews are inadequate. They don’t tell the whole story. They come up short and can even misdirect. It’s not their fault, or

Related