The New ASTROLOGY

n last month’s column I added some dissenting comments to my book review, in that same issue, of by Alexander Boxer. I felt this was necessary due to his brief and one-sided treatment of the work of the late Michel Gauquelin. In adding a few notes and comments to that, I want to reiterate that in a sense Gauquelin’s work, was out of place in the book itself, which was mainly directed toward astrology’s contribution to our modern technologically driven world, coupled with its lack of proof