Civil War Times

LANGUAGE MISCONCEPTION

O PERSON IN THE UNITED STATES from the 1830s through the 1850s thought in terms of an “antebellum” era. Latin for “before the war,” the word came into use only after the Civil War ended and participants, historians, and others sought to label the decades preceding the outbreak of fighting at Fort Sumter. Commonplace in the historical literature for many generations, it summons thoughts of a young republic lurching toward political collapse. Deployment of antebellum can create an impression of inevitability, of citizens increasingly obsessed with sectional differences, and of time ticking inexorably toward bloodshed on a massive

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Civil War Times

Civil War Times1 min read
Historynet
VISIT HISTORYNET.COM A week after Gettysburg, violence consumed New York City. Elizabeth Oakes Smith’s diary recorded it all. By Jonathan W. White historynet.com/witness-new-yorkdraft-riots What happened today, yesterday—or any day you care to searc
Civil War Times2 min read
How A “man Of Such Promise” Failed
On the first page of Conflict of Command, George Rable posits, “People have largely made up their mind about George McClellan—and not in the general’s favor; nor do they seem amenable to rethinking their position.” He then spends 336 pages essentiall
Civil War Times2 min read
Lost Initiative
Refighting the Civil War still hasn’t lost its appeal, especially in regard to large-scale engagements with as many “what ifs” attached as General Robert E. Lee’s Maryland Campaign. Posing a greater threat than the Army of Northern Virginia did with

Related Books & Audiobooks