Film Comment

THE BIG SCREEN

The Last Black Man in San Francisco

BY STUART KLAWANS

Director: Joe Talbot

Country/Distributor: USA, A24

Opening: June 7

ONCE YOU’VE HEARD THE STORY behind The Last Black Man in San Francisco, you’re stuck with facts that are too distracting to dwell on and too informative to ignore. It’s as if you were to learn that the author of Great Expectations really was an orphan named Pip, who had spent part of his youth in the home of a crazy spinster. No doubt the knowledge would add to your pleasure—but only after you’d fallen in love with the work.

So, to take things in proper order with Joe Talbot’s lovely, quasi-Dickensian film, begin with Jimmie (Jimmie Fails): a young man in whose eyes worry has taken up permanent residence, just south of his Navy watch cap and north of that untucked red windowpane-check shirt he never changes. First seen hanging out in the weeds, rocks, and rubble by the side of a road, where he looks out over the most toxic industrial backwater of San Francisco Bay, Jimmie sits next to his best and only friend Mont (Jonathan Majors)—office-friendly shirt, soft and stylish sport coat, well-buzzed hair—whose contrasting expression is one of watchful reserve.

Triangulating these two into their immediate setting, Talbot furnishes a few mournfully funny items: a crew in hazmat suits picking up waste on the street, a preacher holding forth to nobody from atop a plastic milk crate (his theme: the impoverishment and poisoning of the black people who built America), and a wayward bus, which promises to swing through the Hunters Point neighborhood but seldom takes the trouble.

Droll curiosity about the preacher gives way in Jimmie and Mont to anxiety about the bus; they’re going to be late. For what, the audience does not yet know—but rather than wait for officially sanctioned transportation, Jimmie takes off on his skateboard, Mont climbs behind, and off they zoom as the camera rolls with them, winding and gliding into a city that reveals itself by turns as a hilltop panorama, a series of passing storefronts and office buildings, and the faces of people staring back in super slow motion. You see the paradise priced out for all but a few, the capital of touristic escapades and dereliction, the movie’s love object and locus of historical romance: San Francisco.

All these aspects of the city soon concentrate in a wood-frame gingerbread house in the Fillmore district. This, it turns out, is the destination to which Jimmie and Mont could not bear to be late. Again, the audience does pauses from its restlessness for the first time, to show view after gorgeous stationary view of rooms that are temporarily empty, except for rich wain scotting, elaborate moldings, manorial banisters, and leaded glass windows bearing monograms. Real-estate porn? For many in San Francisco, the answer would be yes. For Mont and especially Jimmie, no.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Film Comment

Film Comment3 min read
A New Old Master
Alice Guy Blaché Vol. 1: The Gaumont Years (1897-1907), Vol. 2: The Solax Years (1911-1914), USA; Kino Lorber The Intrigue: The Films of Julia Crawford Ivers, USA, 1915-1916; Kino Lorber FEW DIGITAL COMPILATIONS HAVE HAD AS REVELATORY AN effect on Am
Film Comment2 min read
Out There
Expanded Cinema: Fiftieth Anniversary Edition By Gene Youngblood, Fordham University Press, $34.95 GENE YOUNGBLOOD’S OPUS EXPANDED CINEMA IS A manifesto and a prophecy, at times clairvoyant in its claims for the future, at others ridiculous in its bu
Film Comment10 min read
Can Dialectics Break Bricks?
WHAT IF WE LEFT THEIR CONTENTS ASIDE and examined their physical qualities (paper, ink, weight, etc.)?” Camilo Restrepo says in his 2015 documentary short, Impression of a War, as the camera zooms into the warped, oversaturated pages of discarded Col

Related