The Railway Magazine

ACCESS ALL AREAS?

ASK someone for their views on open access passenger operations and the response will give you a pretty good idea where they stand on the much larger issues of railway ownership and structure.

For some, open access is the ultimate expression of free enterprise on the railway – a way to improve services, reduce fares and increase choice through competition. But for others, it is a distraction from the real business of running a cohesive railway system, a wasteful use of scarce capacity and a drain on already stressed franchised operators on key routes. And, of course, rail already has strong competition from cars, coaches and airlines.

Such contrasting, strongly held beliefs make it hard to establish a clear, objective view of the benefits – or otherwise – of open access, but with the current Government apparently keen to encourage new passenger operators, it is a good time to look at the successes and failures so far and what the future holds.

We’ll also take a brief look at mainland Europe, where several countries have followed the UK example in opening up their national networks to new operators, with varying degrees of success.

The complexity and cost of bidding for open access paths, not to mention the (understandable) reluctance of operators to accommodate competitors on ‘their’ route, and more practical issues such as capacity, means only a few schemes have actually made it onto the rails.

When the original 25 franchises were created in the mid-1990s, the privatised structure had an in-built contradiction from the outset. Franchise bids were based on the level of subsidy the train companies would receive for running services.

Budding open access operators were effectively squeezed out as no-one wanted to risk the best and most profitable services being 'cherry-picked' and damaged by new competitors. As a result, only a handful of services have ever run outside the franchise system.

New rules

Interestingly, the UK’s first open access passenger operation was not aimed at providing competition to a franchised main line operator – it was Heathrow Express (HEX). Taking advantage of the new rules on open access after Privatisation, HEX started its dedicated service between London Paddington and Heathrow Airport in 1998, operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of British Airports Authority (BAA), now Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd.

The project started as a joint venture between British Rail and BAA, but following Privatisation in 1994, the latter took full control.

In 2018, Heathrow Airport decided to hand over the operation of HEX to Great Western Railway (GWR), which

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from The Railway Magazine

The Railway Magazine5 min read
Readers’ Platform
PANORAMA in the April issue (pages 46/47) offered an irresistible question, intended rhetorically but provoking the idle detective in me:“Is there anything in this shot that gives it away as being taken this year and not towards the end of steam in t
The Railway Magazine3 min read
Partners ‘Proud’ Of Successful Nuclear Material Movements By Rail
NUCLEAR Transport Solutions (NTS), the parent company of Direct Rail Services, has announced that a project involving the movement of 1068 drums of low level radioactive waste from Winfrith in Dorset to Cumbria for final disposal, was concluded signi
The Railway Magazine11 min read
Neville Hill 125 Years Old And Still Evolving
AS the 19th century drew to a close, the North Eastern Railway concluded that it needed another depot in Leeds to augment capacity. Accommodation at the former Leeds and Thirsk Railway’s Holbeck depot (about half-a-mile north of the ex-North Midland

Related