STAT

Opinion: Precision medicine’s rosy predictions haven’t come true. We need fewer promises and more debate

Precision medicine has had minuscule effects on public health while the costs are astronomical. Is it really the best approach for improving health?

Twenty years ago, Dr. Francis Collins, who was then director of the National Center for Human Genome Research, made rosy predictions in his Shattuck Lecture about the health benefits sure to flow from the Human Genome Project. His paper on the lecture, “Medical and Societal Consequences of the Human Genome Project,” published in the New England Journal of Medicine, provided an early template for the precision medicine narrative of the past two decades.

As we wrote last week in a Viewpoint in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, these predictions haven’t come to pass.

Collins’ fundamental idea was that the technology and insights of the would demonstrate tight causal links between variation in DNA sequences and complex human traits, including the disorders that

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About Sanofi Licensing Novavax’s Covid Shot, Moderna’s RSV Vaccine, And More
Sanofi said it has reached a licensing deal to sell Novavax’s Covid shot as well as to try to combine the vaccine with Sanofi’s own flu vaccine.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About FDA Dithering On Pharma Patents, WHO Pandemic Talks, And More
When it comes to a crucial controversy over patents for drug-and-device combination products, the FDA has been MIA.
STAT2 min readAmerican Government
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About FTC Reviewing Novo-Catalent Deal, Amneal Opioid Settlement, And More
The FTC wants more information on a $16.5 million deal in which Novo Nordisk's parent company would purchase Catalent, a contract drug manufacturer.

Related Books & Audiobooks