The Railway Magazine

NODDING ALONG THE ‘PACER’ STORY › PART 3

AFTER the introduction of the BRE-Leyland Class 141s in September 1983, and the subsequent order of the first 50 Class 142s in January 1984, one could be forgiven for thinking the Derby/Workington partnership had the light railbus market pretty well cornered. After all, they had effectively developed the concept from the prototype LEV1 into something cheap and workable, if not necessarily desirable or comfortable.

Yet BRE-Leyland did not have the monopoly on the manufacture of the ‘Pacers’. Even as the Class 141 design was evolving into the ‘142s’, British Rail invited three other bus builders – Metro-Cammell of Washwood Heath, Walter Alexander of Falkirk and Marshalls of Cambridge – to submit their own designs for a lightweight multiple unit based upon the ‘141s’, and tender for their construction.

The contract for 25 two-car units was thus awarded jointly to Walter Alexander and Andrew Barclay of Kilmarnock on January 16, 1984 at the same time BRE-Leyland won the Class 142 order. Alexander would build the bodies and Barclay the underframes (to the Derby design), final assembly being carried out in Kilmarnock.

The new units became the Class 143s, and while clearly of the same family as the BRE-Leyland products, they were distinctly different, especially in terms of aesthetics. Like the Workington-built units the Class 143’s aluminium bodies were constructed using existing road bus panels, this time from Alexander’s P-type. A more rounded cab front was fitted, but again employing a three-window windscreen, with destination box in the centre window.

Each car measured 51ft 0½in, the same as the Class 142, but were slightly narrower at 8ft 10½in, compared to the 9ft 2¼in of the ‘142s’.

They were split into Driving Motor Standard (DMS Nos. 55642-55666) and Driving Motor Standard Lavatory (DMSL Nos. 55667-55691) configurations, with seating for 62 in the DMS and 60 in the DMSL on 3+2 seat bus-type seats. Passenger access was via three sets of twin-leaf doors on each side of a two-car set.

As built, they were numbered 143001 to 143025, but these would change in due course with subsequent refurbishments and modifications. Like the BRE-Leyland units they drew their power from a Leyland ‘TL11’ 205hp engine beneath each car, and featured mechanical Self Changing Gear (SCG) transmission, giving

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from The Railway Magazine

The Railway Magazine11 min read
Neville Hill 125 Years Old And Still Evolving
AS the 19th century drew to a close, the North Eastern Railway concluded that it needed another depot in Leeds to augment capacity. Accommodation at the former Leeds and Thirsk Railway’s Holbeck depot (about half-a-mile north of the ex-North Midland
The Railway Magazine1 min read
Heritage Line Landslip
THE Ecclesbourne Valley Railway has reached its £30,000 fundraising target to restore services to Duffield after a landslip. The target was reached with hundreds of donations from the public and one anonymous gift of £10,000. The railway has only bee
The Railway Magazine1 min read
Memorial Day Celebrates The Life Of RM Writer Peter Nicholson
WESTONZOYLAND Pumping Station Museum hosted a Memorial Day for the family and friends of the late Peter Nicholson on March 24. Peter, who made a significant contribution to railway preservation (standard and narrow gauge) as owner of a collection of

Related