Nautilus

The Fundamental Limits of Machine Learning

From a computer’s standpoint, the difficulty in pattern recognition is one of surplus: with an endless variety of patterns, all technically valid, what makes one “right” and another “wrong?”Photograph from Wikicommons

Not long ago, my aunt sent her colleagues an email with the subject, “Math Problem! What is the answer?” It contained a deceptively simple puzzle:

She thought her solution was obvious. Her colleagues, though, were sure their solution was correct—and the two didn’t match. Was the problem with one of their answers, or with the puzzle itself?

My aunt and her colleagues had stumbled across a fundamental problem in machine learning, the study of computers that learn. Almost all of the learning we expect our computers to do—and much of the learning we ourselves do—is about reducing information to underlying patterns, which can then be used

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Nautilus

Nautilus6 min readIntelligence (AI) & Semantics
Why AI Can Never Make Humans Obsolete
This article is part of series of Nautilus interviews with artists, you can read the rest here. Angie Wang is a Los Angeles-based artist who has thought a lot about AI, and even more about what it means to be a human. Her illustrated essay for The Ne
Nautilus6 min read
A Scientist Walks Into a Bar …
It sounds like the setup to a joke: When I was starting out as a stand-up comedian, I was also working as a research scientist at a sperm bank.  My lab was investigating the causes of infertility in young men, and part of my job was to run the clinic
Nautilus13 min read
The Shark Whisperer
In the 1970s, when a young filmmaker named Steven Spielberg was researching a new movie based on a novel about sharks, he returned to his alma mater, California State University Long Beach. The lab at Cal State Long Beach was one of the first places

Related