Arsenal of Musings

By Mr. Jeffrey Robert Palin Jr.

Q & A including various Philosophy-related questions. Musings whereby various questions/answers are explored. An extensive collection of questions and answers that delve into a wide array of thought-provoking topics. They are open-ended, engaging, and encourage deep thinking. They cover a vast landscape of topics. Encourages critical thinking and a deeper engagement with the world around us.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Mr. Jeffrey Robert Palin Jr.
• Release date: Apr 7, 2025
• ISBN: 9798230227700

Mr. Jeffrey Robert Palin Jr.

To one, glass half empty. To another, glass half full. When it comes to accurate perspectives, sometimes one realizes one and doesn't realize the other as soon. Although not in all cases of differing perspectives, this is proof that people don't have to have the same perspective as each other since two different people can have two different perspectives about the same thing, yet, although different, those two different perspectives are both accurate. "People having differing Perspectives can (but not always)" = "different but not unacceptable nor disdain-related"

Book preview

Q and A:

The Present may just be Continuity Presentism, which is the continuation of what already just existed and has existed since its origination (Continuation of what was, by which Temporal continuity is Causal flow from moment to moment) and all moments prior to the present moment have passed/ceased to exist, and the future always does not yet exist and is unrealized potential whereby time progressing forward/flow speed is dependent on how all of the laws of The non-digital Universe/non-digital Nature (such as gravity and etc) as a whole affect time/temporalness".

––––––––

All of this as a whole:

Hypothetically, is intelligence able to ever naturally occur if confirming things was/is never possible?

I don’t think so because one would not even be able to confirm that they even thought/had a thought."

Confirmation is Foundational: The act of confirming or verifying things is an inescapable requirement to form knowledge. Belief without confirmation is not the same as knowing. Credibility is Not Verification: Believing something solely based on the credibility of the source is not a form of verification or confirmation. One can convince an other that something is the case, but that doesn’t mean that they convinced them of a proven fact.

Is explanation a practical and required part of human life or even survival? What would the world be like if all humans suddenly absolutely at-all-times refuse to explain anything? What things is explanation required for human advancement?

Regarding tracking not writing-related signatures of various existences, what are, if at all, the only natural ways for existences such as humans, dogs, cats, mice, insects, birds, fish, etc to do that and what are, if at all, the only ways for technology to do that?

Abstract things are not physical and are not able to be tasted due to the fact that they do not have physical attributes such as flavor. Language/memories/emotion/emotions are never not abstract and non-physical.

Digital is able to simulate biology/biological, but digital is never able to be biology/biological, correct?

How does digital uploading work? How does biological uploading work? Is cross uploading between digital and biological possible?

Are the words gauge and judge synonymous in a way whereby either of both of those words can be used to convey what one does to find out the how much of an extent something is"?

They are not entirely synonymous but they can be used interchangeably in many cases. Also, saying use your judgement to measure whether the situation is too dangerous is the same as saying gauge whether the situation is too dangerous."

Impossibilities according to current Quantum Mechanics theories: - Simultaneously knowing position and momentum exactly (Heisenberg) - Cloning unknown quantum states (No-Cloning Theorem) - Measurement without affecting the system - Deterministic prediction of quantum outcomes depending on whether the universe is deterministic, having an extent of stochasticness, or having an extent of inscrutably complexness.

The Present may just be Continuity Presentism, which is the continuation of what already just existed and has existed since its origination (Continuation of what was, by which Temporal continuity is Causal flow from moment to moment) and all moments prior to the present moment have passed/ceased to exist, and the future always does not yet exist and is unrealized potential whereby time progressing forward/flow speed is dependent on how all of the laws of The non-digital Universe/non-digital Nature (such as gravity and etc) as a whole affect time/temporalness".

Are there any two different-than-each-other frequencies that would enable two atoms to occupy the same exact space at the same exact time?

Regarding digital 3D environment configurations/constructs, are there able to be multiple objects, avatars, or entire environments occupying the same coordinate space simultaneously without being able to interact with each other?

Has there been any proof of accessing other universes/realms/domains via frequency, vibration etc.? No — that remains in the realm of speculation, metaphors, or non-empirical ideas. Has there been confirmed scientific proof of other universes/realms/domains? No — not yet.

Does God have volition and self-agency? Are those included as part of omnipotence?

Language is not an entity, a mood is not an entity, but a rock is an entity, and a soul, if exists, is an entity, correct?

If all were to become one, due to there being no other to compare one to, there would not be able to be things such as personalities, perspectives, attractiveness, appealingness, etc.

Has there ever been a confirmed, verifiable case of a human who had a sensory organ/etc capable of sensing physical dimensions that are other than 3D?

Has there ever been a confirmed, verifiable case of a person transitioning or person who had transitioned from one physical dimension (like our 3D space) into another (such as a 4D or 5D space)?

Neutrality = one’s state of non-interference without investment. It’s when you’re aware something exists, you’re not helping or hindering it, & you genuinely don’t have a stake in the outcome, or cases of no malice, no allegiance, just coexistence without engagement, or non-interference if due to neutral indifference or because you doesn’t care, but if due to respectful restraint, it’s respect instead. You don’t have to be part of the reason why/how there is what is simultaneously non-benevolent andnon-neutral(, and unnecessary harm) at this world.

An adult asks two kids what’s the best memory you have?. One kid answers when I went on a Cruise for family vacation. The other kid answers when I used my superpowers to defeat The Hulk. Did both kids interpret what the word memory refers to properly?

When did biological ai first exist? When did xenobots first exist? The first Xenobots were created in 2020.

When was the first TV show available for internet streaming without one having had to download the episode or show in order to have viewed it? Around 1997, there was ABC News website that offered viewing of ABC World News Tonight. The website offered video clips from World News Tonight segments that were no more than 20 seconds long. You had to download to play them, there was no streaming, and even these short clips took a long time to download.

More than only recognizing speech, when was AI first able to give accurate answers to a variety of human’s questions in normal computer English text or audio without human intervention nor long no-response times in between its giving answers? The first AI system that was able to do such is/was IBM’s Watson, which was introduced in 2011. It even competed and won against human contestants in the quiz show Jeopardy!.

When were common household computers first commonly being used for recreational video chatting? Did CU-SeeMe require broadband internet connection during the year 2000? Did the majority of households have WiFi during the year 2000? In the year 2000, the majority of households did not have WiFi; according to data from the Pew Research Center and Statista, only around 42% of US households had internet access in 2000, meaning most did not have WiFi, which was still a relatively new technology at the time. WiFi is the wireless alternative to non-wireless internet, during the year 2000, most households had non-wireless internet that was via Broadband. Broadband dial-up internet was commonplace. In 2001, only 23% of hotel rooms offered broadband, but by 2004, half of all hotel rooms in the US offered broadband. Skype was one of the first software-based video chat services that offered free communication over the internet. Skype’s 2.0 Beta program in 2005 introduced video calling with a simplified interface.

Was Tamagotchi the first for-kids simulation that was a computer-tech device that "displayed