Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Le Morte D'Arthur: The Legends of King Arthur
Le Morte D'Arthur: The Legends of King Arthur
Le Morte D'Arthur: The Legends of King Arthur
Ebook662 pages12 hours

Le Morte D'Arthur: The Legends of King Arthur

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Le Morte D'Arthur (The Death of Arthur) is a touchstone compilation of stories and legends about King Arthur. Compiled and added to by Sir Thomas Mallory, this book has served as the foundation for many writers of stories about King Arthur.
This Xist Classics edition has been professionally formatted for e-readers with a linked table of contents. This eBook also contains a bonus book club leadership guide and discussion questions. We hope you’ll share this book with your friends, neighbors and colleagues and can’t wait to hear what you have to say about it.

Xist Publishing is a digital-first publisher. Xist Publishing creates books for the touchscreen generation and is dedicated to helping everyone develop a lifetime love of reading, no matter what form it takes



LanguageEnglish
Release dateMar 30, 2015
ISBN9781623958626
Le Morte D'Arthur: The Legends of King Arthur

Related to Le Morte D'Arthur

Related ebooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Le Morte D'Arthur

Rating: 3.8758690376569036 out of 5 stars
4/5

717 ratings20 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Keith Baines' edited version of Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur renders Malory's compendium of Arthurian legends into modern idiom. Malory's Arthur and Knights of the Round Table would likely appear strange to those familiar with the Arthur stories from Tennyson's Idylls of the King and T.H. White's The Once and Future King. In Malory's 15th-century retelling of the traditional legends, the knights frequently behead those they best in jousting, beget bastards on various ladies, and regard chivalry more in its original meaning of horsemanship rather than the later Victorian ideals. That shouldn't alienate those who come to these stories from their later reworkings, as Malory seems to set his Arthur in all times, blending elements from 500 C.E. through the 1100's.The stories overlap at times, but, for the sake of ease, Malory divides them into eight books: The Tale of King Arthur; The Tale of King Arthur and the Emperor Lucius; The Tale of Sir Launcelot du Lake; The Tale of Sir Gareth; The Book of Sir Tristram of Lyoness; The Tale of the Sangreal; The Book of Sir Launcelot and Queen Gwynevere; and Le Morte d'Arthur. All of the books fit together to make one larger narrative, though The Book of Sir Tristram of Lyoness (a retelling of Tristan and Iseult) stands alone and could serve as its own book. While the story of Tristan and Iseult likely predates the Arthurian legends, by Malory's time it had been incorporated into that body of work (after it had likely influenced the relationship of LLancelot and Guinevere). The strongest books in the series are The Tale of King Arthur, The Tale of the Sangreal, The Book of Sir Launcelot and Queen Gwynevere, and Le Morte d'Arthur.If looking for an edition of Le Morte d'Arthur to serve as an introduction to the larger Arthurian tradition, Baines' translation is a serviceable work.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Very difficult, monotonous reading. Lots of smoting and brasting. Surprising source of subsequent Arthurian legends which bear little resemblance to Malory's work.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The first time I read this I was a college student immersed in literature. I loved the language and imagery, truly felt transported to another time and place. With this second reading I see James Bond. Arthur roams the countryside, bedding/leaving damsels, fighting/killing whatever gets in his way, getting himself wrapped up in conspiracies and evil plots, all without losing his smirk. OK, maybe Malory doesn't mention the smirk, but you know it's there.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I think I read this over and over when I was a child, and when I came back to it as an adult, I still loved it. These tales are an ingrained part of western culture and are still a weather value for the rough winds of our morality.

    Of course Mallory's tales of Arthur are a fifteenth century re-modelling but what glorious new dressing has been added. Each tale is a short story in its own right, and each combines effortlessly to create the picture of heroes and a kingdom in which people mattered, in which civilisation was something to strive for and not something to endure.

    Maybe I'm just a sucker for Arthurian tales. They still delight and captivate me (all except the recent film version with Clive Owen and Keira Knightly) and I'm glad they do. We all know right and wrong is more complex than in Mallory's tales, but at least he makes living up to even simple choices filled with hurdles and pitfalls. Maybe that's why they work, because every hero wears his failings as openly as he wears his sword and shield.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    An essential Arthurian Legend text.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "The Beast with the Hair on". The spelling is regularized but that's the only concession made to the modern reader. The Tales are unorganized, but that's part of the fun. Also we should consider that Malory's organization differs from our personal one because he was writing for his own time. A great read, which rewards rereading. I know Ive been back to it several times.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I listened to the Librivox audiobook version, but the age of the text makes it pretty hard to follow in places, so I went back and reread some chapters at sacred-texts.com. My favourite parts of this were the parts I didn't already know (basically the whole Lancelot and Guinevere business and the grail quest) -- I think the best section is the bit where King Arthur is bored doesn't feel like paying taxes so he fights the entire Roman Empire, and then when he's defeated everyone and is in charge of everything he just goes home.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Beautiful, oversized hardcover edition of this classic work. Learn the story of King Arthur as is was first "recorded." Highly recommended!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I barely got halfway through this book. While the stories are fun, the language makes for a slow, difficult read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Very long, but as usual interesting that something written so long ago is still relatively current.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Classic tale of King Arthur and his Knights, read it at Uni, and want to read it properly without studying it to enjoy it more.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The mother of all Arthurian legends. Not the easiest reading, and extremely repetitious at points, but worth it if you like King Arthur stories. The ending chapters on the fall of Camelot are incredible.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    An absolute childhood favorite - I took my Malory (and my thesaurus) everywhere! I fear I wore out a few copies before I acquired this sturdy hardcover.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    despite the difficult language (this is an untranslated version) very good read.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    While I can appreciate it's standing as the English epic and the beauty of its prose, the key moments are disarrayed within a relentless series of encounters between incredible knights. Homer and Virgil are more believable and more touching because they are more human. Were I to recommend the death of Arthur, I would probably specify portions that avoid the action-movie feel of endless jousts. The opening sets the foundation of Arthur (Excalibur, Mordred) and is the only part involving Merlin. Perhaps a few sections in the middle regarding Sir Beumains, Sir Tritram, and the Lady Isoud would also be included. The last few hundred pages finally bring out a plot, showing the conflict between Lancelout and Arthur -- and the tragic result. If one wants to understand the nature of the knight errant, they might read just a few chapters to get the idea.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Having adored T.H. White's "The Once and Future King" in high school, I figured I would read this classic treatment of the Arthurian legends and enjoy it as well. Unfortunately, Malory's work was far less entertaining. Sure, I expected prose from the 15th century to be a harder to get through and denser than White's 20th century treatment, but "Le Morte D'Arthur" barely has an actual story. Malory gives us a series of very repetitive events and makes it difficult to identify with or even care about the main characters. I did give the book three stars, though, almost completely on the strength of the first chapters that go over Arthur's rise to the throne and the final chapter recounting his legendary death. These are worth reading and are very good. Overall, though, if you are looking for a more meaningful and entertaining telling of the Arthurian legends, go to White.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This Edition is based on Caxton's text: It therefore very largely contains the original detailed content - alterations have been confined almost entirely to spellings and a little grammar.This is the 'Romance' as conceived by Malory; every human strength and frailty explored through a tale of fair and foul maidens bestowing favours and demanding submission from manly counterparts, valiant and timid knights gripped by purity of motives and the basest of desires, the noble pursuit of mystical religious objects, considerable magic worked for good and bad, lived folk-lore, and at its core a legendary great King whose moral reputation, avowed love and sincere loyalty for his fellows in the face of every sort of affliction, assault and treachery survives unsullied to the present day. Be he real or imagined - Arthur - is one of the greatest characters ever written down in the English language - with his gallant, chivalric recruits to the Round Table, their strong-willed female companions and array of adversaries the range of all future English Literature (and much for Europe and modern America) is given a riveting basis for its later global success.It is said (by many) Cervantes' Don Quixote was the first modern novel - I disagree - 'The Death of Arthur' in my estimation has that significant role.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I know Le Mort d'Arthur is supposed to be a great classic and the definitive Arthur, but damn it, I'm 377 pages in and I can't do it anymore. It is just too much of the same flipping story over and over and over and over again. And not just the same story (knight jousts with knight), but almost the same exact wording with each battle. The only thing to have sparked my interest in about 200 pages was this line: "The King Arthur overtook her [a false lady and sorceress], and with the same sword he smite off her head, and the Lady of the Lake took up her head and hung it up by the hair to her saddle-bow." THAT is pretty damn awesome, but it's also just one line out of all those 200 pages, and it made me long for a Lady of the Lake story, not more and more of these knights smacking each other around and talking about how knightly and courtly they are because they are big strong men who can politely knock another guy off a horse. I am so wonderfully wroth at this book that I'm about to come at all of these damn knights like thunder and smote them down with their own damn lances. (PS. If I never see the words "wroth", "smote", or "came together like thunder" again, it will be too soon.) Seriously, don't these guys have anything better to do than run around the forests or hang out a bridges and joust with each other? Isn't there farming or something to be done? Anything? Please? I mean, I'll read about the wheat in the fields at this point. Did I also mention that it's over 900 pages? Well, it is, and apparently this is the SHORT version. The other version is in like three volumes or something. Since it's getting the point that I'm starting to hate Arthur and his knights, I need to just put in the towel and read something — anything — else for a while. Right now, I'm really looking forward to rereading Simon Armitag's translation of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, because I need something to remind me why I used to love Arthurian stories so much.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I agree with the reviewer who said this is not for the faint of heart, and few general readers are going to find this a great read. If you're looking for an absorbing, entertaining read with characters you can relate to and root for, you're absolutely, positively in the wrong place. Read instead Arthurian novels such as T.H. White's The Once and Future King or Mary Stewart's Merlin Trilogy. There are countless other such novels inspired by this material worth reading, and I've read a lot of them.But I did find it interesting at times going through this, one of the ur-texts as it were of Arthurian legend. There are other, earlier works of Arthurian literature: Geoffrey of Monmouth's The History of the Kings of Britain (1136), Chrétien de Troyes's Arthurian Romances in the 12th century and Wolfram von Eschenbach's Parzival in the 13th century are among the most notable. But Malory drew from several sources, so much so he's often described more as the "compiler" than the author of the work. I own a edition in two volumes that comes close to 1,000 pages. So this is an exhaustive resource of all sorts of facets of the legend. The story of Tristram and Iseult is here, for instance. And this is a medieval work, so it's imbued with its assumptions and attitudes. Obviously a source of outrage to some reviewers, and even by the standards of the time, comparing this to how women are treated in say Boccaccio's Decameron and Chaucer's Canterbury Tales--well, women don't come off well here. Misogyny abounds. And knights are held up as paragons who commit a lot of heinous acts and just plain WTF. A lot is repetitive and a slog--as one reviewer put it too much is "joust, joust, joust." And this was written about half-way between Chaucer and Shakespeare. With the spelling regularized it's quite readable, much more so than unmodernized Chaucer. But with those that choose to preserve the archaic words, that means wading through words such as "hight" (is called) and "mickle" (much). And there's just so much that can be excused by, well, "it's the times"--I found plenty of medieval writers who were wonderful reads, and just plain more humane: Dante, Boccaccio, Chaucer. I can't see Malory as their equal--not remotely. But as a fan of Arthurian literature and someone fascinated by the Middle Ages, this did from time to time have its fascinations.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Malory was a medieval author who wrote the first recorded account of the largely mythical King Arthur. It is largely an account of the 100 knights of the round table (or "table round"). Unfortunately, these stories are rarely interesting (except maybe for graphic descriptions of quality kills) and it really gets tedious. The stories we commonly associate with King Arthur have their seeds here, but are fleshed out derivatives, it's hard to see the story we're all familiar with. Perhaps Malory was a minstrel and these tales made for good song, but for read, they are dull, dull, dull.

Book preview

Le Morte D'Arthur - Sir Thomas Mallory

[v2^book_preview_excerpt.html}˖Gݯ#N zZDQRKr  ٕLB  Y2q_ӟ_퇷?ӟt'o~|o?>?㻿OOiZ=iJm q7َ駼ӟ^@#pl e`tXI)O>~:昅JvwmEuIP{حrn9S &S[P3@ObÈB w 9vL~w~QpN6fPsnP}[_F;|45_p[pdMC6}x}d4y:fQwcMA7颒,"MΝͣt'8qiʻQSLw-; U WxGQUaRWp—pUOM۶]}*'?ANCؠ@|cկ LH,©GR1/=rMy~dщG/oe+tm u 7᫲xv4z~o]r4ѷj:ps3tk10@\ ٹ<0 >wP}Mnc:*ˎd(N`)|^& wNwmX)lfQYcc#\3p x$:tܱ#2Ճu9IQ1k_ M#ZҷgQ$ȅAWxG e3^Ⱦ?wZ_gYJ}|FFDDpሽzIVRtME{قz9ޗey`uk{~?cJ]طa[GJ rMC麢jP V9juZT" WU05UN6m<ʢ?4k3i>#y^Gӹ{j Jns}@x{u'=k|w.UtșUN|F9gA%+*+i^0;BٍbJ@R˜c7 %k=QW4W6) cU\dzcjC~/M1ɏ u)(M bl:5ʌ •0S+G&5Rw\#!TL|/ixm5J$PehC(4:+:E=c u:OƮ'vZ tе`UfJ2LyS* `oc g+E RF3ŧ pQiqJpEEi,2Wj4#5j(]@7eƝ kM'+NËtpKj8shOCab s;dCl.a*/xf`|gr&wv@6<^ YC`ϰ# P>@RW%,B6nLMeO@/ Uiz:΄>{jvDyī^J'6y]5 QmgzR=ۺQt>õ)3եdHO1}toW܎]9\v3PԊID X0nmuŐܪ 7"@)sv_5 x)P1A0ڊuE22neFZ! "#Vs4X굉r r6%YvP ZADfaeD5ʝ jm&㝷 ihǵQ3A+rҵ0B'M+څћUsKjXx|3x.XYNg(&Z׻t=q5xQۧVVxO ̑?r@*/sw5<3JT+ys~ynvwpM;ioBzgdRI_! ӻ:byd'BΠ}U΢ΧJ4ޛ%lTj}j+7_HǤw qTL ^W$nq1@<{cPs09u p<|$C_E!.v~WG:I{>Fc!bsrOQzt q{Z"t+R &xY2›EL )Bg/=] vpe3BuN](Z2VtkUzB><9Y-. %+QW(ib =l݉|u>/7߅%ITT{v&i_Zޫ?4jI|/aq;fe1'zn3nhj8vxn 9Fe1z9@&pc/c}ҐɿHA˙=uo߁q{x36Tpp~#{6yZY[f4;zg/#|EQug>s:+pgv`bhnl!_=o^o6hbh'a.1͋X/>oq"Wr?}$t%wv`\~u`"ShеO *ߌ*<#NҬnչ\]Ȑ5辞v;Ag 膐92{O*C.(wRgw~<3uY'lN͔HORoEW/*hnϡVz@lo<iZبnN {T=uj0'\1,U zQOنL(G̺]ӻߑHvM 0^~.+zM NJ@X3ʖv5&Dx$|X\^'u.;2ji13eJOޣŲhH8%H8 +8Ȯ*}|ҙZOOP`-MK}^)U!Ua?S*|`k]gf-O-a .mdK0 }9 WBȌbEڿM #ՌٜPR\lo;8 ;G5e1:i-㹫OI+K trmzɋơs3di70WrR36f3'h,.\_6 ~|`:lyX.voApcZg@#?/-kW#sq|Xe!һ=g*+u cZ={*Ey!O;Dd3O8Gr:z%5S@$OK9 \k66%Hf*=(/hJN&cTI#3=Y x)+4kv]/G2wx"*qLȦ!3;h"Ѳ S=̌YUI7jC֣=fRy7G[̔f෭YeA5 eX49TBr=KFTPtJ|tw#c).j[,0b %`PdYmqGW\xp?^点ïm"^9gh(>hm ½6 hL_kd&l-!j-kG ɝe*{I|Uyrmqdx TN <8?*enR1zw &Yv9PZ-R]K5ػ}RȀ:)l.:0ՇHJz#9ܠ>|U]>j(u lSF KwVTdx\XH/it%()b%~ȸ&DEJ6+;=3 {|E<1:ޮ~1b.[(+4g$9(_UT\+Kl5!DB )]*C/K`3ܟ5PAh ŨVT+Suhflk9CHeR圀[P&~BNl6{31gxy{EA S#I Ԡg{}!$rE\wX5Kx3Rwwk'Y`扝e]!1e:cWZO{cg8J2Nx}u͞!$gQ$f- "~eQ$dl,ᯃ 72s\b00vT[|;4y%ȑ꧵{-J#3M^,R0rfQ;dK/õ;0GVQ\djG3@&A~-0yR6^ _Ɣ{d:-5%}As&'h&)ZR:sAIϚ#Kxl۝{(<dMRG%f[4ƫ*㘝uwR05*'EU6,g= ¿bj|7Y XaI ZKvU2xk}EaGò E K?.LSHn7o"X'&مTynq%mR-P1hJסb_x"qMz#UTD+#4Ν" /NAAar ++UJnE8I 0b΢J1 t"6ջY5K_r&Eis,Y4Z/ GyIz.qEe{cԠzcmSb(Unlujd|z2-B5C'YyyR g%'w /Ajˣ%G8H(#eiO`QC73BD*@nZsǗB_=4Z6Y&c*8kƭTjU͌no3 :tl>iEU(LWd92B%~JAW;J)7/^EW$Bg;ز.$$Ӛq\"z͐>VLN'$tN2i(V`uZ7,zբps:FQ!Y,cz<9gЭmjsd"[aZJ0ɴs2yA˥`>J(1>x g8r#]cvԭ`wB!*tj \KD{X i/ ǫ\s qWeB@9k$§ _5XN2KÞT;cp.5k UΤPwF>goW0z7lweݐ<ܣ5-tkzI>klx2-4xWm#qDhx&[#u S(}Cgp_=\>1SB9=˘Kr2mQ]F{mʴ㼧;|+@=u0ۚ!>{+02:ޕ*XBh0#-P#wdw-ܒXt]7©^]<*6;+yUbTWdeߘ:eJ&F{ɩP.</sYvU;e+YY-?{!< k㻈)+~qz:U3&e Ѡ֡.yo](6ڊ^j8y `%߭>y}hi$0GkEuiUSZTUO {/T*ʈ$-hhRV>.Fn8ˑ*FͽY {*+-:Pì1F KuΤ]MGk][ӫo^!-Lu f .EÉMz+)tq@cՀ/0”4l`wvq :ϖp@׫RY'a`d6ۢuz$r%<_yZ=;&Z4Yy5:lf^߰hw J_ң}]H+,ݱx`n(t@\}3f/sU~ʿhm\݃Ы<eOeT [)=^S{kciثY>m/]y$ U'S4>KKD ?ݖ]9 cp|/:%S8+c%_龃٪[#Դ]KTEU/U}+VgelNb2G_WͭKۗ;j_S" *Ƙ!Yet+˷aͩ\5׀՛*ֻ+_,[#L.r"JTLFHL\";7BhJq[v<% [JU[uu=5J)b1b{r˥SQ\g(]$o+Uxv-ԢZϩI/ )WJXוaD > 0<5nϚ5ݺ,+lutE) GmPj4 պ\[v\ob6_^4*F`F; U/֟~v^nqd34nogUWg2jjׂ2i׏:.H%OdŦ)&{u{ [TbU"G@\4tO |zr7 }ҮK#}=X67XB7'I' 눼+]ϚXmrxI]1K={2$j=Ig]^at!hAtx1ȶd~%ouׅ#ښ_͚@cuzG'Eصt6P[ g!{p27 Jg(uJŒoH~~;EywvM-c~J[˩x͌&v4iO5.g!쁼 Ȱ$g2T#_ B^aWLR}}sFY5rnRY=V, ïu׫7uw-V3ޭ{c PLeNQc%}WKZ7C0PWXru9v=w[ !/%4B 8tQA~H7TfuxNhowY2 Wy"C-ij.g[I9̹~}:9*, !皱])b\y9}/z~̸d!P^B[ennޙeW:G=l[Kۖ%2߁VT"Lz@ z֬30Ah-reZ 77xsvIYeư$ή'AC:Wȗf*9Xd~͕]UR@a|kŰKʒ~Ԃ,-&@HyYh޵hbnJ;: R@ԟ!R~(b+-u!S=X]6!6!1ꈹm"3D8_R@݊@Zu# ˞&օ+-?ۥ[1?JBY%իG !T*A<|W@+4͐_(8R)JHJE]J$B勞t.Kw"P-=gjJV9l{VUh^V^5K?K4͵쳈Q@`V=~&rqe()n%ݬ_/Zn\TCE2!h&Dm<^E!ZTkRMWi7Ert=qk fːu\#8]pdI98YmRQ3FTn sytnђ@wNq X74K뾪-B΢!X^`/ A1g)r0+w:ͷ7šcf|h0CiF$4VSƒSm$DJcd'Oz0Xswi\4s-OBM^-`r߅N9N+GןՊ.yАo3cW[f!Ƨ9UyjԠ!)|H~CAs$]n-ګZnn82 emScSHQ̵<-SYY&]=ѯ!2Y'o7j_Us{܌0o-ؠjSrE5YtRn:Mo[:[gˊWLpwY`VFj~DƼ:4X}Snϩzč#]foZUT!O&ZZ6G 7[+uCuJB%']s^֠@ĩmrdS JWU5 N<ߕ&<s.ixZ9G̦Ti3  _#p9! ࣻw岆qVVb2,M[ϛX緣(Ah&O(.1@!| 4p4JQB'uݼţV[Z]E4U](us`7;vR,l5޻+N^>]Xw񙓠b=t!\>́f鋏C}RKfzfEo< bAH,O[IVUܻF9iߨ^Gq+-}ȡgP3 Jg@plN0 kWo%@Pu U$~uܛyjnL;8V}Êf1UJl-~tK]H4]yw}M{\@sw%( TtgZQ2"7A{>VLF42ib[D &`(<讦qޮ~JeE1>u}HVDGߎFN҆чٶM'^^Q_R9t(’l&JU yT]ƃ[q$+Mp1=<4Y$#Z,*5 OjS'Lj1/y_+(0)&={UIjޤ.3aɢ%b}!J]]N3ZHҮZ+;Qy/jE8bZ2WjjaE0wr=E?T, >3ۘ!nD~ۼxT-]fy֯)9OmF,z4Yh>;S0@j1WezQ]xa'"rJ'*ʝp~mqT`ZٳxLS_s2?φl9:fL;m"+Uبg>OɺKOgRT۰.\8k68{S7B[ t)y.]ȭ1]Âh^n-*Ym0~Qɤ`p }4[KV< g ɚ;F1cXCaҐUoՐkjVti4j<(ڲ7҉m8GIllsP^@dJVۈo'-'*+2|gX;-{ðQguG޹ Eh-> _X2Lճ}U*Duqw>]cx8F>1^>V$O f/^F T3 hv(^RꪅOCjeeA~بGs; ?f8Xgijy ҥ7ld_=ԯbi;GƤ7X- f\[f#$;s*[q+w[S[_Ӊ Q[-fgnVqo7T =nSH=/;<5??7'UuwtbiEQ<ɯ UEI쉺IDiQ$OYZ =iR3b-q__T)nDaB}BS9ީ@s 80Ҩݟfmm.":~Sbq5>*(4zojǿ 3J2lbnjE-uw+nz<&,:&"CY/l_@/`
Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1