Audiobook15 hours
Making the Supreme Court: The Politics of Appointments, 1930-2020
Written by Charles M. Cameron and Jonathan P. Kastellec
Narrated by Lee Goettl
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
()
About this audiobook
Appointments to the United States Supreme Court are now central events in American political life. However, this has not always been the case. As late as the middle of the twentieth century, presidents invested little time and effort in finding and vetting nominees. Media coverage was desultory, public opinion was largely non-existent, and the justices often voted independently and erratically.
In Making the Supreme Court, Charles M. Cameron and Jonathan P. Kastellec show how the growth of federal judicial power from the 1930s onward inspired a multitude of groups struggling to shape judicial policy. Over time, some groups moved beyond lobbying the Court to changing who sits on it. Other groups formed expressly to influence appointments. These activists and organized groups penetrated the national party system so that after about 1980, presidential candidates increasingly pledged to select and confirm nominees who conformed to specific policy and ideological litmus tests. Once in office, these presidents reshaped the executive selection system to deliver on their promises. As Cameron and Kastellec argue, the result is a new politics aimed squarely at selecting and placing judicial ideologues on the Court. They make the case that this new model gradually transformed how the Court itself operates, turning it into an ideologically driven and polarized branch.
In Making the Supreme Court, Charles M. Cameron and Jonathan P. Kastellec show how the growth of federal judicial power from the 1930s onward inspired a multitude of groups struggling to shape judicial policy. Over time, some groups moved beyond lobbying the Court to changing who sits on it. Other groups formed expressly to influence appointments. These activists and organized groups penetrated the national party system so that after about 1980, presidential candidates increasingly pledged to select and confirm nominees who conformed to specific policy and ideological litmus tests. Once in office, these presidents reshaped the executive selection system to deliver on their promises. As Cameron and Kastellec argue, the result is a new politics aimed squarely at selecting and placing judicial ideologues on the Court. They make the case that this new model gradually transformed how the Court itself operates, turning it into an ideologically driven and polarized branch.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherHighbridge Company
Release dateNov 21, 2023
ISBN9781696613453
Related to Making the Supreme Court
Related audiobooks
Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Takeover: How a Conservative Student Club Captured the Supreme Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Roe v. Dobbs: The Past, Present, and Future of a Constitutional Right to Abortion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupreme Disorder: Judicial Nominations and the Politics of America's Highest Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Warren Court and the Democratic Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rehnquist Choice: The Untold Story of the Nixon Appointment that Red Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rehnquist Choice: The Untold Story of the Nixon Appointment that Redefined the Supreme Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5FDR's Gambit: The Court Packing Fight and the Rise of Legal Liberalism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Packing the Court: The Rise of Judicial Power and the Coming Crisis of the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Coming of Democracy: Presidential Campaigning in the Age of Jackson Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Who Decides?: States as Laboratories of Constitutional Experimentation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCan Democracy Survive Global Capitalism? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dollars for Life: The Anti-Abortion Movement and the Fall of the Republican Establishment Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Death of the Senate: My Front Row Seat to the Demise of the World's Greatest Deliberative Body Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Democracy In Darkness: Secrecy and Transparency in the Age of Revolutions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaughing at Myself: My Education in Congress, on the Farm, and at the Movies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5No Property in Man: Slavery and Antislavery at the Nation’s Founding Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Loud Minority: Why Protests Matter in American Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Isolated Presidency Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5War at the Wall Street Journal: Inside the Struggle to Control an American Business Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Enigma of Clarence Thomas Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Rift: Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, and the Broken Friendship That Defined an Era Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5After the Fall Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Working Class Republican: Ronald Reagan and the Return of Blue-Collar Conservatism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Courts For You
Why the Innocent Plead Guilty and the Guilty Go Free: And Other Paradoxes of Our Broken Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Power of Our Supreme Court: How Supreme Court Cases Shape Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Presumed Guilty: How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Most Dangerous Branch: Inside the Supreme Court's Assault on the Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Scheme: How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One Vote Away: How a Single Supreme Court Seat Can Change History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Court Judges Terminology: Essential Terms for Criminal, Civil, Family, Administrative, and International Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMake Your Case: Finding Your Win in Civil Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5New York Notary Public Exam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Prosecutors: A Year in the Life of a District Attorney's Office Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Justices Behind Roe V. Wade: The Inside Story, Adapted from The Brethren Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Edge of Doubt: The Trial of Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Justice Deferred: Race and the Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGet Bail, Leave Jail: America’s Guide to Hiring a Bondsman, Navigating Bail Bonds, and Getting Out of Custody Before Trial Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Most Powerful Court in the World: A History of the Supreme Court of the United States Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Unbelievable Lawsuit Stories: The 100 Funniest, Weirdest & Craziest Lawsuits in History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Edge of Malice: The Marie Grossman Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Making the Supreme Court
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings
0 ratings0 reviews
